Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractBiological treatment of steroidal drug industrial effluent and electricity generation in the microbial fuel cells    Next AbstractCharacterization of Odors of Wood by Gas Chromatography-Olfactometry with Removal of Extractives as Attempt to Control Indoor Air Quality »

Talanta


Title:Evaluation of two passive samplers for the analysis of organophosphate esters in the ambient air
Author(s):Liu R; Lin Y; Liu R; Hu F; Ruan T; Jiang G;
Address:"State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; Environment Research Institute, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China. State Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China. Electronic address: tingruan@rcees.ac.cn"
Journal Title:Talanta
Year:2016
Volume:20150916
Issue:
Page Number:69 - 75
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.034
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3573 (Electronic) 0039-9140 (Linking)
Abstract:"Both polyurethane foam (PUF) and sorbent-impregnated PUF (SIP) passive air sampling (PAS) methods were deployed and compared separately for the analysis of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in outdoor atmospheric environment. During an continuous period of 84 days, parallel samples were also collected by a high-volume active air sampler (HV-AAS) to assess the contamination levels and to calibrate uptake parameters of PAS. The total concentration of OPEs in both particulate and gaseous phases ranged from 1.50 to 5.64ng m(-3) in ambient air. Tris(2-chloroisopropyl) phosphate (TCPP) was the dominating analog, representing 78+/-9% of total OPE concentration. SIP-PAS showed longer linear-phase sampling period for TCPP, and accumulated more amount of the most volatile triethyl phosphate (TEP) and tributyl phosphate (TBP) homologues, while similar sorption performances of both PAS methods were found for most of the semi-volatile OPEs. Linear sampling rates in PUF-PAS and SIP-PAS disks were calculated for individual OPEs except for TEP and TBP, and the average uptake rates (3.3+/-1.1 and 3.5+/-1.7m(3)d(-1), respectively) were close to the acknowledged value (4m(-3)d(-1)) for persistent organic pollutants. Besides, isotopic labeled D15-Triphenyl phosphate (TPhP) could be used as a viable depuration compound to calculate site-specific sampling rates of OPEs, with a linear loss of up to approximately 60% at the end of deployment time"
Keywords:Organophosphate esters Passive air sampler Polyurethane foam Sorbent-impregnated polyurethane foam;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINELiu, Ruirui Lin, Yongfeng Liu, Runzeng Hu, Fanbao Ruan, Ting Jiang, Guibin eng Netherlands 2015/11/26 Talanta. 2016 Jan 15; 147:69-75. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2015.09.034. Epub 2015 Sep 16"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024