Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractHeadspace Gas Monitoring of Gut Microbiota Using Targeted and Globally Optimized Targeted Secondary Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry    Next AbstractEgg-Surface Bacteria Are Indirectly Associated with Oviposition Aversion in Bactrocera dorsalis »

Food Res Int


Title:Comparison of fermentation behaviors and properties of raspberry wines by spontaneous and controlled alcoholic fermentations
Author(s):Li H; Jiang D; Liu W; Yang Y; Zhang Y; Jin C; Sun S;
Address:"School of Food Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong 264025, PR China; Institute of Food Science and Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai, Shandong 264005, PR China. School of Food Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai, Shandong 264025, PR China; Institute of Food Science and Engineering, Yantai University, Yantai, Shandong 264005, PR China. Electronic address: sysun81@aliyun.com"
Journal Title:Food Res Int
Year:2020
Volume:20191121
Issue:
Page Number:108801 -
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108801
ISSN/ISBN:1873-7145 (Electronic) 0963-9969 (Linking)
Abstract:"Torulaspora delbrueckii is a widely studied non-Saccharomyces yeast, described as having a positive impact on the organoleptic quality of wines, however, little is known about its impact on the production of raspberry wine. In this study, we compared combined use of S. cerevisiae/T. delbrueckii pair, i.e., in sequential inoculation (RT) and co-fermentation (RC) modes, with spontaneous fermentation (RU) and single S. cerevisiae inoculation (RS), on various properties of raspberry wine including fermentation behaviors (using yeast counts and next-generation sequencing method), basic composition (by OIV, 2019), volatile profile (using headspace-gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry), sensory property (by quantitative descriptive analyses) and biogenic amine levels. All the alcoholic fermentations were completed within 9 days; T. delbrueckii was inhibited by S. cerevisiae in the co-culture; and Saccharomyces and Mrakia were the most abundant species in RU. A total of 40 aromas was identified, with RT abundant in volatile esters, ketones and terpenes and others showing relatively lower intensities. During sensory evaluation, RT was characterized by 'fruity' and 'sweet' notes; RC was notable for a high 'floral' attribute; RU scored the highest in 'pungent' and RS showed intermedium intensities for most descriptors. Partial least squares regression showed the relationship between aromas and sensory descriptors. As for biogenic amine, RU contained the highest total amount and RS had the least. Overall, RT had greater potential to be used in the production of raspberry wine"
Keywords:Alcoholic Beverages/*microbiology Ethanol/chemistry/*metabolism Fermentation *Food Microbiology *Rubus Saccharomyces cerevisiae/*physiology Torulaspora/*physiology Alcoholic fermentation Hs-gc-ims Raspberry wine Sensory evaluation T.delbrueckii Volatile;
Notes:"MedlineLi, Huamin Jiang, Dongqi Liu, Wenli Yang, Yanqing Zhang, Yunshu Jin, Chengwu Sun, Shuyang eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Canada 2020/01/21 Food Res Int. 2020 Feb; 128:108801. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108801. Epub 2019 Nov 21"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 04-12-2024