Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractThe Electronic Nose's Emerging Role in Respiratory Medicine    Next AbstractAlcohol exposure during development: analysis of effects on female sexual behavior »

Water Res


Title:Occurrence and removal of priority pollutants by lamella clarification and biofiltration
Author(s):Gasperi J; Rocher V; Gilbert S; Azimi S; Chebbo G;
Address:"Universite Paris-Est, LEESU, UMR MA 102, AgroParisTech, 61 avenue du Gal de Gaulle, 94010 Creteil Cedex, France. gasperi@univ-paris12.fr "
Journal Title:Water Res
Year:2010
Volume:20100301
Issue:10
Page Number:3065 - 3076
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.035
ISSN/ISBN:1879-2448 (Electronic) 0043-1354 (Linking)
Abstract:"This study investigates the occurrence of all priority substances (n = 41) listed in the Water Framework Directive and additional substances (n = 47) in raw sewage, as well as the removal performance of lamella clarification and biofiltration techniques. Once the efficiency of both types of techniques has been assessed for typical wastewater parameters, the differences in each technique's ability to remove pollutants becomes obvious; nevertheless, pollutant removal in quantitative terms still depends on the physico-chemical properties of the compounds used and operating conditions within the selected facility. For lamella clarification, the removal of organic chemicals was found to be primarily correlated with their sorption potential and, hence, strongly dependent upon log K(ow) of the compound under study. Compounds with a strong hydrophobic character (log K(ow) > 4.5) are removed to a significant extent (approx. 85%), while hydrophilic compounds (log K(ow) < 3.5) are poorly removed (<20%). For biofiltration, the removal of chemicals appears to be compound-dependent, although this outcome involves several mechanisms, namely: i) physical filtration of total suspended solids, ii) volatilisation, iii) sorption, and iv) biotransformation of substances. Even if the complex processes within a biofilter system do not yield an accurate prediction of pollutant removal, two groups of chemicals can still be clearly identified: i) hydrophobic or volatile compounds, for which moderate to high removal rates are observed (from 50% to over 80%); and ii) hydrophilic, non-volatile and refractory compounds for which a low removal rate would be expected (<20%)"
Keywords:"Filtration/*methods Waste Disposal, Fluid/*methods Water Pollutants/*isolation & purification;"
Notes:"MedlineGasperi, Johnny Rocher, Vincent Gilbert, Solene Azimi, Sam Chebbo, Ghassan eng England 2010/04/03 Water Res. 2010 May; 44(10):3065-76. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.02.035. Epub 2010 Mar 1"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024