Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAcute toxicity of marking pen emissions    Next AbstractIrritancy and sensitization potential of glyoxylic acid »

Toxicol Sci


Title:Evaluation of the contact and respiratory sensitization potential of volatile organic compounds generated by simulated indoor air chemistry
Author(s):Anderson SE; Wells J; Fedorowicz A; Butterworth LF; Meade B; Munson AE;
Address:"National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA. sanderson4@cdc.gov"
Journal Title:Toxicol Sci
Year:2007
Volume:20070307
Issue:2
Page Number:355 - 363
DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm043
ISSN/ISBN:1096-6080 (Print) 1096-0929 (Linking)
Abstract:"Up to 60 million people working indoors experience symptoms such as eye, nose and throat irritation, headache, and fatigue. Investigations into these complaints have ascribed the effects to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from building materials, cleaning formulations, or other consumer products. New compounds can result when the VOCs react with hydroxyl or nitrate radicals or ozone present in indoor environments. Several oxygenated organic compounds, such as glyoxal, methylglyoxal, glycolaldehyde, and diacetyl, have been identified as possible reaction products of indoor environment chemistry. Although research has previously identified diacetyl and glyoxal as sensitizers, additional experiments were conducted in these studies to further classify their sensitization potential. Sensitization potential of these four compounds was assessed using quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) programs. Derek for Windows and National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health logistic regression predicted all compounds to be sensitizers, while TOPKAT 6.2 predicted all compounds except for methylglyoxal. All compounds were tested in a combined irritancy and local lymph node assay (LLNA). All compounds except for glyoxal were found to be irritants and all tested positive in the LLNA with EC3 values ranging from 0.42 to 1.9%. Methylglyoxal significantly increased both the B220(+) and IgE(+)B220(+) cell populations in the draining lymph nodes and total serum IgE levels. The four compounds generated by indoor air chemistry were predicted by QSAR and animal modeling to be sensitizers, with the potential for methylglyoxal to induce IgE. The identification of these compounds as sensitizers may help to explain some of the health effects associated with indoor air complaints"
Keywords:"Acetaldehyde/analogs & derivatives/toxicity Air Pollution, Indoor/*adverse effects Animals Body Weight/drug effects Dermatitis, Contact/*pathology Diacetyl/toxicity Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Ear, External/pathology Female Glyoxal/toxicity Immunoglo;"
Notes:"MedlineAnderson, Stacey E Wells, J R Fedorowicz, Adam Butterworth, Leon F Meade, B J Munson, Albert E eng 2007/03/10 Toxicol Sci. 2007 Jun; 97(2):355-63. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfm043. Epub 2007 Mar 7"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-09-2024