Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractNegative feedback in ants: crowding results in less trail pheromone deposition    Next AbstractAnts adjust their pheromone deposition to a changing environment and their probability of making errors »

J Theor Biol


Title:How to not get stuck-negative feedback due to crowding maintains flexibility in ant foraging
Author(s):Czaczkes TJ;
Address:"Biologie I, Universitat Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany. Electronic address: tomer.czaczkes@gmail.com"
Journal Title:J Theor Biol
Year:2014
Volume:20140714
Issue:
Page Number:172 - 180
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.07.005
ISSN/ISBN:1095-8541 (Electronic) 0022-5193 (Linking)
Abstract:"Ant foraging is an important model system in the study of adaptive complex systems. Many ants use trail pheromones to recruit nestmates to resources. Differential recruitment depending on resource quality coupled with positive feedback allows ant colonies to make rapid and accurate collective decisions about how best to allocate their work-force. However, ant colonies can become trapped in sub-optimal foraging decisions if recruitment to a poor resource becomes too strong before a better resource is discovered. Genetic algorithms and Ant Colony Optimisation heuristics can also suffer from being trapped in such local optima. Recently, two negative feedback effects were described, in which an increase in crowding (crowding negative feedback-CNF) or trail pheromones (pheromone negative feedback-PNF) caused a decrease in subsequent pheromone deposition. Using agent based simulations with realistic parameters I test whether these negative feedback effects can prevent simulated ant colonies from becoming trapped in sub-optimal foraging decisions. Colonies are presented with two food sources of different qualities, and these qualities switch part way through the experiment. When either no negative feedback effects are implemented or only PNF is implemented colonies are completely unable to refocus their foraging effort to the high quality feeder. However, when CNF alone is implemented at a realistic level 97% of colonies successfully refocus their foraging effort. This ability to refocus colony foraging efforts is due to the strong reduction of pheromone deposition caused by CNF. This suggests that CNF is an important behaviour enabling ant colonies to maintain foraging flexibility. However, CNF comes at a slight cost to colonies when making their initial foraging decision"
Keywords:"Animals Ants/*physiology Computer Simulation Crowding/*psychology Exploratory Behavior/*physiology Feedback, Physiological/*physiology *Models, Biological Pheromones/metabolism Aco Adaptive systems Agent based model Collective organisation Pheromone;"
Notes:"MedlineCzaczkes, Tomer J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2014/07/19 J Theor Biol. 2014 Nov 7; 360:172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Jul 14"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-07-2024