Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractVolatile compounds characteristic of sinus-related bacteria and infected sinus mucus: analysis by solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry    Next AbstractSoil nutrient status determines how elephant utilize trees and shape environments »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:Remote monitoring of Cydia pomonella adults among an assemblage of nontargets in sex pheromone-kairomone-baited smart traps
Author(s):Preti M; Favaro R; Knight AL; Angeli S;
Address:"Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy. Instar Biologicals, Yakima, WA, USA"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2021
Volume:20210514
Issue:9
Page Number:4084 - 4090
DOI: 10.1002/ps.6433
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Print) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Captures of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), in traps are used to establish action thresholds and time insecticide sprays. The need for frequent trap inspections in often remote orchards has created a niche for remote sensing smart traps. A smart trap baited with a five-component pheromone-kairomone blend was evaluated for codling moth monitoring among an assemblage of other nontargets in apple and pear orchards. RESULTS: Codling moth captures did not differ between the smart trap and a standard trap when both were checked manually. However, the correlation between automatic and manual counts of codling moth in the smart traps was low, R(2) = 0.66 / 0.87. False-negative identifications by the smart trap were infrequent <5%, but false-positive identifications accounted for up to 67% of the count. These errors were primarily due to the misidentification of three moth species of fairly similar-size to codling moth: apple clearwing moth Synanthedon myopaeformis (Borkhausen), oriental fruit moth Grapholita molesta (Busck), and carnation tortrix Cacoecimorpha pronubana (Hubner). Other false-positive counts were less frequent and included the misidentifications of dipterans, other arthropods, patches of moth scales, and the double counting of some moths. CONCLUSION: Codling moth was successfully monitored remotely with a smart trap baited with a nonselective sex pheromone-kairomone lure, but automatic counts were inflated in some orchards due to mischaracterizations of primarily similar-sized nontarget moths. Improved image-identification algorithms are needed for smart traps baited with less-selective lures and with lure sets targeting multiple species"
Keywords:Animals Insect Control *Malus *Moths Pheromones/pharmacology *Pyrus *Sex Attractants/pharmacology Sesiidae Tortricidae automatic detection codling moth electronic trap pome fruit;
Notes:"MedlinePreti, Michele Favaro, Riccardo Knight, Alan Lee Angeli, Sergio eng England 2021/04/30 Pest Manag Sci. 2021 Sep; 77(9):4084-4090. doi: 10.1002/ps.6433. Epub 2021 May 14"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024