« Previous AbstractThe role of phytophagy by predators in shaping plant interactions with their pests    Next Abstract"Outpatient Telemedicine Program in Vascular Surgery Reduces Patient Travel Time, Cost, and Environmental Pollutant Emissions" »

Environ Health Perspect

Title:		Source attribution of health benefits from air pollution abatement in Canada and the United States: an adjoint sensitivity analysis
Author(s):		Pappin AJ; Hakami A;
Address:		"Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada"
Journal Title:		Environ Health Perspect
Year:		2013
Volume:		20130222
Issue:		5
Page Number:		572 - 579
DOI:		10.1289/ehp.1205561
ISSN/ISBN:		1552-9924 (Electronic) 0091-6765 (Print) 0091-6765 (Linking)
Abstract:		"BACKGROUND: Decision making regarding air pollution can be better informed if air quality impacts are traced back to individual emission sources. Adjoint or backward sensitivity analysis is a modeling tool that can achieve this goal by allowing for quantification of how emissions from sources in different locations influence human health metrics. OBJECTIVES: We attributed short-term mortality (valuated as an overall 'health benefit') in Canada and the United States to anthropogenic nitrogen oxides (NO(x)) and volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions across North America. METHODS: We integrated epidemiological data derived from Canadian and U.S. time-series studies with the adjoint of an air quality model and also estimated influences of anthropogenic emissions at each location on nationwide health benefits. RESULTS: We found significant spatiotemporal variability in estimated health benefit influences of NO(x) and VOC emission reductions on Canada and U.S. mortality. The largest estimated influences on Canada (up to $250,000/day) were from emissions originating in the Quebec City-Windsor Corridor, where population centers are concentrated. Estimated influences on the United States tend to be widespread and more substantial owing to both larger emissions and larger populations. The health benefit influences calculated using 24-hr average ozone (O(3)) concentrations are lower in magnitude than estimates calculated using daily 1-hr maximum O(3) concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Source specificity of the adjoint approach provides valuable information for guiding air quality decision making. Adjoint results suggest that the health benefits of reducing NO(x) and VOC emissions are substantial and highly variable across North America"
Keywords:		Air Pollution/*prevention & control Canada Humans Nitrogen Oxides/analysis Ozone/analysis United States Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis;
Notes:		"MedlinePappin, Amanda Joy Hakami, Amir eng Canadian Institutes of Health Research/Canada Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/02/26 Environ Health Perspect. 2013 May; 121(5):572-9. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205561. Epub 2013 Feb 22"