Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractReproductive effects in male and female rats from neonatal exposure to p-octylphenol    Next AbstractRecent advances in insect neuropeptides »

J Biol Rhythms


Title:Task-Related Phasing of Circadian Rhythms in Antennal Responsiveness to Odorants and Pheromones in Honeybees
Author(s):Nagari M; Szyszka P; Galizia G; Bloch G;
Address:"Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, The A. Silberman Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. Department of Neuroscience, University of Konstanz, Germany"
Journal Title:J Biol Rhythms
Year:2017
Volume:20171006
Issue:6
Page Number:593 - 608
DOI: 10.1177/0748730417733573
ISSN/ISBN:1552-4531 (Electronic) 0748-7304 (Linking)
Abstract:"The insect antennae receive olfactory information from the environment. In some insects, it has been shown that antennal responsiveness is dynamically regulated by circadian clocks. However, it is unknown how general this phenomenon is and what functions it serves. Circadian regulation in honeybee workers is particularly interesting in this regard because they show natural task-related chronobiological plasticity. Forager bees show strong circadian rhythms in behavior and brain gene expression, whereas nurse bees tend brood around-the-clock and have attenuated circadian rhythms in activity and whole-brain gene expression. Here, we tested the hypothesis that there is task-related plasticity in circadian rhythms of antennal responsiveness to odorants in worker honeybees. We used electroantennogram (EAG) to measure the antennal responsiveness of nurses and foragers to general odorants and pheromones around the day. The capacity to track 10-Hz odorant pulses varied with time of day for both task groups but with different phases. The antennal pulse-tracking capacity was higher during the subjective day for the day-active foragers, whereas it was better during the night for around-the-clock active nurses. The task-related phases of pulse-tracking rhythms were similar for all the tested stimuli. We also found evidence for circadian rhythms in the EAG response magnitude of foragers but not of nurses. To the best of our knowledge, these results provide the first evidence for circadian regulation of antennal olfactory responsiveness and odorant pulse-tracking capacity in bees or any other hymenopteran insect. Importantly, our study shows for the first time that the circadian phase of olfactory responsiveness may be socially regulated"
Keywords:Animals Arthropod Antennae/*physiology Bees/*physiology *Circadian Rhythm Locomotion Odorants Pheromones *Smell antenna circadian division of labor electroantennogram honeybee insect olfaction pulse tracking;Neuroscience;
Notes:"MedlineNagari, Moshe Szyszka, Paul Galizia, Giovanni Bloch, Guy eng 2017/10/07 J Biol Rhythms. 2017 Dec; 32(6):593-608. doi: 10.1177/0748730417733573. Epub 2017 Oct 6"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 18-11-2024