Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractReversed functional topology in the antennal lobe of the male European corn borer    Next AbstractPollination of Specklinia by nectar-feeding Drosophila: the first reported case of a deceptive syndrome employing aggregation pheromones in Orchidaceae »

Indoor Air


Title:Sprays and diffusers as indoor air fresheners: Exposure and health risk assessment based on measurements under realistic indoor conditions
Author(s):Karr G; Quivet E; Ramel M; Nicolas M;
Address:"Ineris (French National Institute for Industrial Environment and Risks), ISAE, Verneuil-en-Halatte, France. Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, LCE, Marseille, France. CSTB (Scientific and Technical Center for Building), Pollem, Saint Martin d'Heres, France"
Journal Title:Indoor Air
Year:2022
Volume:20210827
Issue:1
Page Number:e12923 -
DOI: 10.1111/ina.12923
ISSN/ISBN:1600-0668 (Electronic) 0905-6947 (Linking)
Abstract:"Noncombustible air fresheners are indoor air emission sources of concern. The associated health risks should be better understood. Based on 15 products (4 sprays, 6 passive diffusers, and 5 active diffusers), the health risk assessment (HRA) approach was applied to a national use survey in France and to concentrations measured in an experimental house. The targeted substances included volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbonyls, and fine particles (PM(2.5) ). Mean-use and reasonable worst-case generic scenarios were designed. No situation of concern occurred regarding chronic exposure associated with the mean use. Under the reasonable worst-case scenarios, the chronic risk could exceed selected health reference standards, mainly for acrolein (average inhaled concentration (AIC) up to 3.5 microg/m(3) ), benzene (AIC up to 4 microg/m(3) ), and limonene (AIC up to 8 mg/m(3) ). The acute exposure, defined as a 1-h exposure, could exceed selected health standards, primarily for acrolein (up to 23 microg/m(3) ) and formaldehyde (up to approximately 370 microg/m(3) ). Furthermore, the 1-h average PM(2.5) concentration, including ultrafine particles, could exceed 100 microg/m(3) , typically for sprays. These results suggest that the highest exposures should be reduced and, as such, that the emissions of the highest-emissivity products should be lowered"
Keywords:"*Air Pollutants/analysis *Air Pollution, Indoor/analysis Environmental Monitoring/methods Particulate Matter/analysis Risk Assessment *Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis air fresheners diffusers emission sources health risk assessment indoor air sprays;"
Notes:"MedlineKarr, Guillaume Quivet, Etienne Ramel, Martine Nicolas, Melanie eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2021/08/28 Indoor Air. 2022 Jan; 32(1):e12923. doi: 10.1111/ina.12923. Epub 2021 Aug 27"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-07-2024