Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractProspects and Challenges of Volatile Organic Compound Sensors in Human Healthcare    Next AbstractSelf-modeling curve resolution techniques applied to comparative analysis of volatile components of Iranian saffron from different regions »

J Chem Inf Comput Sci


Title:Use of computer-assisted methods for the modeling of the retention time of a variety of volatile organic compounds: a PCA-MLR-ANN approach
Author(s):Jalali-Heravi M; Kyani A;
Address:"Department of Chemistry, Sharif University of Technology, P.O. Box 11365-9516, Tehran, Iran. jalali@sharif.edu"
Journal Title:J Chem Inf Comput Sci
Year:2004
Volume:44
Issue:4
Page Number:1328 - 1335
DOI: 10.1021/ci0342270
ISSN/ISBN:0095-2338 (Print) 0095-2338 (Linking)
Abstract:"A hybrid method consisting of principal component analysis (PCA), multiple linear regressions (MLR), and artificial neural network (ANN) was developed to predict the retention time of 149 C(3)-C(12) volatile organic compounds for a DB-1 stationary phase. PCA and MLR methods were used as feature-selection tools, and a neural network was employed for predicting the retention times. The regression method was also used as a calibration model for calculating the retention time of VOCs and investigating their linear characteristics. The descriptors of the total information index of atomic composition, IAC, Wiener number, W, solvation connectivity index, X1sol, and number of substituted aromatic C(sp(2)), nCaR, appeared in the MLR model and were used as inputs for the ANN generation. Appearance of these parameters shows the importance of the dispersion interactions in the mechanism of retention. Comparison of the MLR and 5-2-1 ANN models indicates the superiority of the ANN over that of the MLR model. The values of 0.913 and 0.738 were obtained for the standard error of prediction set of MLR and ANN models, respectively"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEJalali-Heravi, M Kyani, A eng 2004/07/27 J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Jul-Aug; 44(4):1328-35. doi: 10.1021/ci0342270"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024