Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractUrine as a biological modality for colorectal cancer detection    Next AbstractShort-term severe drought influences root volatile biosynthesis in eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L) »

Aliment Pharmacol Ther


Title:Systematic review with meta-analysis: volatile organic compound analysis to improve faecal immunochemical testing in the detection of colorectal cancer
Author(s):Chandrapalan S; Bosch S; Cubiella J; Guardiola J; Kimani P; Mulder C; Persaud K; de Meij TGJ; Altomare DF; Brenner H; de Boer NKH; Ricciardiello L; Arasaradnam RP;
Address:"Coventry, UK. Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Ourense, Spain. L'Hospitalert de Llobregat (Barcelona), Spain. Manchester, UK. Bari, Italy. Heidelberg, Germany. Bologna, Italy. Leicester, UK"
Journal Title:Aliment Pharmacol Ther
Year:2021
Volume:20210518
Issue:1
Page Number:14 - 23
DOI: 10.1111/apt.16405
ISSN/ISBN:1365-2036 (Electronic) 0269-2813 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Faecal immunochemical test (FIT) is emerging as a valid test to rule-out the presence of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, the accuracy of FIT is dependent on the cut-off applied. An additional low-cost test could improve further detection of CRC. AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy of combined FIT and volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the detection of CRC within symptomatic populations. METHODS: Systematic reviews on the diagnostic accuracy of FIT and VOC, for the detection of CRC, were updated. Meta-analyses were performed adopting a bivariate model for sensitivity and specificity. Clinical utility of combined FIT and VOC was estimated using Fagan's nomogram. Post-test probability of FIT negatives was used as a pre-test probability for VOC. RESULTS: The pooled sensitivity and specificity of FIT at 10 microg/g faeces, for the detection of CRC, were 0.914 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.894-0.936) and 0.783 (CI = 0.850-0.696), respectively. For VOC, the sensitivity was 0.837 (CI = 0.781-0.881) and the specificity was 0.803 (CI = 0.870-0.712). The area under the curve for FIT and VOC were 0.926 and 0.885, respectively. In a population with 5% CRC prevalence, the estimated probability of having CRC following a negative FIT was 0.5% and following both negative FIT and VOC was 0.1%. CONCLUSIONS: In a FIT-negative symptomatic population, VOC can be a good test to rule-out the presence of CRC. The estimated probability reduction by 0.4% when both tests being negative offers adequate safety netting in primary care for the exclusion of CRC. The number needed to colonoscope to identify one CRC is eight if either FIT or VOC positive. Cost-effectiveness and clinical accuracy of this approach will need further evaluation"
Keywords:*Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis/epidemiology Early Detection of Cancer Feces Humans Occult Blood Sensitivity and Specificity *Volatile Organic Compounds;
Notes:"MedlineChandrapalan, Subashini Bosch, Sofie Cubiella, Joaquin Guardiola, Jordi Kimani, Peter Mulder, Chris Persaud, Krishna de Meij, Tim G J Altomare, Donato F Brenner, Herman de Boer, Nanne K H Ricciardiello, Luigi Arasaradnam, Ramesh P eng Meta-Analysis Systematic Review England 2021/05/19 Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jul; 54(1):14-23. doi: 10.1111/apt.16405. Epub 2021 May 18"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024