Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAnalyses of chemosensory genes provide insight into the evolution of behavioral differences to phytochemicals in Bactrocera species    Next AbstractCharacterization of benzenemethanethiol in sesame-flavour baijiu by high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and sensory science »

Sensors (Basel)


Title:Development of a Low-Cost Portable Electronic Nose for Cigarette Brands Identification
Author(s):Wu Z; Zhang H; Sun W; Lu N; Yan M; Wu Y; Hua Z; Fan S;
Address:"Tianjin Key Laboratory of Electronic Materials and Devices, School of Electronics and Information Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China"
Journal Title:Sensors (Basel)
Year:2020
Volume:20200730
Issue:15
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/s20154239
ISSN/ISBN:1424-8220 (Electronic) 1424-8220 (Linking)
Abstract:"In China, the government and the cigarette industry yearly lose millions in sales and tax revenue because of imitation cigarettes. Usually, visual observation is not enough to identify counterfeiting. An auxiliary analytical method is needed for cigarette brands identification. To this end, we developed a portable, low-cost electronic nose (e-nose) system for brand recognition of cigarettes. A gas sampling device was designed to reduce the influence caused by humidity fluctuation and the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in the environment. To ensure the uniformity of airflow distribution, the structure of the sensing chamber was optimized by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. The e-nose system is compact, portable, and lightweight with only 15 cm in side length and the cost of the whole device is less than $100. Results from the machine learning algorithm showed that there were significant differences between 5 kinds of cigarettes we tested. Random Forest (RF) has the best performance with accuracy of 91.67% and K Nearest Neighbor (KNN) has the accuracy of 86.98%, which indicated that the e-nose was able to discriminate samples. We believe this portable, cheap, reliable e-nose system could be used as an auxiliary screen technique for counterfeit cigarettes"
Keywords:cigarette brands identification electronic nose gas sensors metal oxide (MOX) sensors sensor array;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEWu, Zhiyuan Zhang, Hanying Sun, Wentao Lu, Ning Yan, Meng Wu, Yi Hua, Zhongqiu Fan, Shurui eng 61501167/National Natural Science Foundation of China/ Letter Switzerland 2020/08/06 Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jul 30; 20(15):4239. doi: 10.3390/s20154239"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-06-2024