Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInduced defenses in herbivores and plants differentially modulate a trophic cascade    Next AbstractActivated carbon as an electron acceptor and redox mediator during the anaerobic biotransformation of azo dyes »

Oecologia


Title:"Inducible defenses, competition and shared predation in planktonic food chains"
Author(s):Van der Stap I; Vos M; Tollrian R; Mooij WM;
Address:"Department of Aquatic Food Webs, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Centre for Limnology, Rijksstraatweg 6, Nieuwersluis, The Netherlands. i.vanderstap@nioo.knaw.nl"
Journal Title:Oecologia
Year:2008
Volume:20080725
Issue:4
Page Number:697 - 705
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-008-1111-1
ISSN/ISBN:0029-8549 (Print) 0029-8549 (Linking)
Abstract:"Ecologists have long debated the role of predation in mediating the coexistence of prey species. Theory has mainly taken a bitrophic perspective that excludes the effects of inducible defenses at different trophic levels. However, inducible defenses could either limit or enhance the effects of predation on coexistence, by means of effects on bottom-up control and population stability. Our aim was to investigate how inducible defenses at different trophic levels affect the possibilities for predator-mediated coexistence, as opposed to competitive exclusion, in replicated experimental plankton communities. In particular, we analyzed how the presence or absence of inducible defenses in algal basal prey affected the outcome of competition between an inducible defended and an undefended herbivore, in the presence or absence of a carnivore. We found the undefended herbivore to be a superior competitor in the absence of predation. This outcome was reversed in the presence of a shared carnivore: populations of the undefended herbivore then strongly declined. The extent of this population decline differed between food webs based on undefended as opposed to inducible defended algal prey. In the former the undefended herbivore became undetectable for most of the duration of the experiment. In the latter the undefended herbivore also crashed to low densities, but it could still be detected during most of the experiment. In food webs based on inducible defended algae, the carnivore failed to reach high densities and exerted weaker top-down control on the two competing herbivores. We conclude that the inducible defense in one of our two competing herbivores allowed the outcome of competition to be reversed when a shared carnivore was added. Inducible defenses in algae did not change this outcome, but they significantly delayed extinction of the undefended herbivore. Predation itself did not promote coexistence in these experimental plankton communities"
Keywords:Analysis of Variance Animals *Competitive Behavior Ecosystem Eukaryota/physiology *Food Chain Population Dynamics *Predatory Behavior Zooplankton/*physiology;
Notes:"Medlinevan der Stap, Irene Vos, Matthijs Tollrian, Ralph Mooij, Wolf M eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Germany 2008/07/26 Oecologia. 2008 Oct; 157(4):697-705. doi: 10.1007/s00442-008-1111-1. Epub 2008 Jul 25"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024