Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractEffects of manipulated herbivore inputs on nutrient flux and decomposition in a tropical rainforest in Puerto Rico    Next AbstractHerbivore trampling as an alternative pathway for explaining differences in nitrogen mineralization in moist grasslands »

Occup Environ Med


Title:The burden of disease related to indoor air in the Netherlands: do different methods lead to different results?
Author(s):Schram-Bijkerk D; van Kempen EE; Knol AB;
Address:"Centre for Environmental Health, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. dieneke.schram@rivm.nl"
Journal Title:Occup Environ Med
Year:2013
Volume:20121130
Issue:2
Page Number:126 - 132
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2012-100707
ISSN/ISBN:1470-7926 (Electronic) 1351-0711 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Dutch policy makers needed a knowledge base for prioritising control of different indoor air pollutants. Several burden of disease (BoD) estimates were available, but it was not known if they could be applied to The Netherlands. OBJECTIVES: To quantify the BoD related to indoor air in The Netherlands, and to compare the outcomes with a previous study (EnVIE), which used a different BoD methodology. RESULTS: The largest BoD was attributable to environmental tobacco smoke. The next most important indoor air pollutants were radon and thoron from soils and building materials, followed by dampness and carbon monoxide (CO). Formaldehyde exposure did not contribute to the total BoD, according to our estimates. The EnVIE estimate was three times higher, and the most important indoor air pollutants by BoD were combustion products from outdoor sources, bioaerosols due to dampness and by outdoor sources, volatile organic compounds, radon from soils, pathogens and CO. The differences in estimates were primarily caused by the different selection or definition of substances in indoor air, rather than the differing BoD methodology. CONCLUSIONS: Indoor air exposure is associated with a considerable BoD in The Netherlands; approximately 1500 healthy life years per 1 million inhabitants are lost due to 1 year of exposure. The results from the different BoD studies examined here are difficult to compare--even the relative order of most important pollutants depends on choices and assumptions in the assessment. A careful evaluation of BoD estimates is required before they can be used in policy making"
Keywords:"Air Pollution, Indoor/*adverse effects/prevention & control Carbon Monoxide/analysis/toxicity Cost of Illness Environmental Monitoring/*methods Formaldehyde/analysis/toxicity Humans Mortality, Premature Netherlands/epidemiology Radon/analysis/toxicity Ris;"
Notes:"MedlineSchram-Bijkerk, Dieneke van Kempen, Elise E M M Knol, Anne B eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2012/12/04 Occup Environ Med. 2013 Feb; 70(2):126-32. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2012-100707. Epub 2012 Nov 30"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024