Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Adult Vine Weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), to Host Plant Odors"    Next AbstractInduced resistance to biotic stress.(Preface) »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:"Catch me if you can: the influence of refuge / trap design, previous feeding experience, and semiochemical lures on vine weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) monitoring success"
Author(s):Roberts JM; Jahir A; Graham J; Pope TW;
Address:"Department of Crop and Environment Sciences, Centre for Integrated Pest Management, Harper Adams University, Newport, Shropshire, UK. Centre for Applied Entomology and Parasitology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, School of Life Sciences, Huxley Building, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2020
Volume:20190812
Issue:2
Page Number:553 - 560
DOI: 10.1002/ps.5545
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Vine weevil, Otiorhynchus sulcatus F. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is one of the most economically important pest species of berry and ornamental crops globally. Monitoring this nocturnal pest can be difficult and time consuming and the efficacy of current tools is uncertain. Without effective monitoring tools, implementation of integrated pest management strategies is challenging. This study tests the relative efficacy of a range of vine weevil monitoring tools. Whether host-plant volatiles and weevil feeding experience influence vine weevil capture is also tested. RESULTS: Monitoring tool efficacy differed overall between the six monitoring tool designs tested and ranged from catches of 0.4% to 26.7% under semi-field conditions. Previous feeding experience influenced vine weevil behavior. In yew conditioned populations, 39% of the weevils responded to and were retained in the trap baited with yew foliage while 37% of weevils from Euonymus fortunei conditioned populations responded to and were retained in the trap baited with E. forunei foliage. A simple synthetic lure consisting of (Z)-2-pentenol + methyl eugenol also increased vine weevil catches compared with an unbaited trap. CONCLUSION: Demonstrating differences in the efficacy of different monitoring tool designs is an important first step for developing improved methods for monitoring vine weevil populations within crops. This study presents the first direct comparison of vine weevil monitoring tool designs and indicates that trap efficacy can be improved by baiting with host-plant material or a synthetic lure based on host-plant volatiles. (c) 2019 Society of Chemical Industry"
Keywords:"Animals Crops, Agricultural Fruit Insect Control Pheromones *Weevils feeding experience monitoring tools pest management semiochemicals vine weevil;"
Notes:"MedlineRoberts, Joe M Jahir, Akib Graham, Juliane Pope, Tom W eng HNS 195/Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board/ England 2019/07/10 Pest Manag Sci. 2020 Feb; 76(2):553-560. doi: 10.1002/ps.5545. Epub 2019 Aug 12"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024