Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractLong-term exposure to close-proximity air pollution and asthma and allergies in urban children    Next AbstractDefective prelamin A processing and muscular and adipocyte alterations in Zmpste24 metalloproteinase-deficient mice »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:Evaluation of candidate systems for mass trapping against Ceratitis spp. on La Reunion island
Author(s):Penarrubia-Maria IE; Quilici S; Schmitt C; Escudero-Colomar LA;
Address:"Institute for Food and Agriculture Research and Technology (IRTA), Mas Badia Experimental Station, La Tallada, Girona, Spain"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2014
Volume:20130715
Issue:3
Page Number:448 - 453
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3591
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Two Ceratitis spp. coexist on the island of La Reunion, Ceratitis rosa (Karsch) and C. capitata (Wiedemann). The effectiveness of candidate systems based on attractants and traps to control both species was evaluated through comparative studies of trap types, attractants, insecticides and commercial complete systems. RESULTS: The Ceratitis spp. most captured in all trials was C. rosa. Captures of C. rosa and C. capitata were not significantly different when Maxitrap(R) or Tephri-trap(R) were used. Captures with the Easy-trap(R) were lower for both species. The BioLure(R) Med Fly lure showed higher catches of C. rosa than Ferag(R) CC D TM. The proportion of dead C. rosa did not differ significantly when deltamethrin or dichlorvos was used. There were no significant differences in the capture of C. rosa and C. capitata between commercial systems composed of the lure Ferag(R) CC D TM, the Maxitrap(R) and dichlorvos and the BioLure(R) Unipak, the Tephri-trap(R) and dichlorvos. The Cera Trap(R) system performed less effectively. CONCLUSION: The most effective traps for the capture of C. rosa and C. capitata were Maxitrap(R) and Tephri-trap(R); the most effective attractants were BioLure(R) Med Fly for C. rosa and BioLure(R) Med Fly, BioLure(R) Unipak and Ferag(R) CC D TM for C. capitata. However, for both species the most effective commercial combinations of trap and attractant were Maxitrap(R) with Ferag(R) CC D TM and Tephri-trap(R) with BioLure(R) Unipak, both using dichlorvos. The insecticide deltamethrin showed good efficacy when used inside traps"
Keywords:Animals Ceratitis capitata/*drug effects/physiology Female Insect Control/*methods Insecticides/*pharmacology Male Pheromones/*pharmacology Ceratitis capitata Ceratitis rosa attractants insecticides mass trapping traps;
Notes:"MedlinePenarrubia-Maria, I Esther Quilici, Serge Schmitt, Chloe Escudero-Colomar, L Adriana eng Evaluation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2013/06/12 Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Mar; 70(3):448-53. doi: 10.1002/ps.3591. Epub 2013 Jul 15"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024