Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Microbial cycling of isoprene, the most abundantly produced biological volatile organic compound on Earth"    Next AbstractEvidence for aggression-modulating pheromones in prepuberal pigs »

Pest Manag Sci


Title:"Aerosol emitters disrupt codling moth, Cydia pomonella, competitively"
Author(s):McGhee PS; Gut LJ; Miller JR;
Address:"Entomology Department, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA"
Journal Title:Pest Manag Sci
Year:2014
Volume:20140310
Issue:12
Page Number:1859 - 1862
DOI: 10.1002/ps.3732
ISSN/ISBN:1526-4998 (Electronic) 1526-498X (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Isomate((R)) CM MIST aerosol emitters (Pacific BioControl Corp, Vancouver, WA) containing 36 g of codlemone, (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol, were deployed at various densities in a commercial apple orchard to generate dosage-response profiles in order to elucidate the behavioral mechanism of disruption. RESULTS: Moth captures decreased asymptotically as Isomate((R)) CM MIST densities increased. Data fitting to Miller-Gut and Miller-de Lame plots yielded straight lines, with positive and negative slopes respectively. Catch of male moths decreased from 28 trap(-1) in the control to 0.9 trap(-1) at the highest emitter density. Disruption of >90% was realized at emitter densities greater than 5 units ha(-1) . CONCLUSION: The resulting set of profiles explicitly matched the predictions for competitive rather than non-competitive disruption. Thus, these devices probably disrupt by inducing false-plume following rather than by camouflaging traps and females. The use of 5 MIST units ha(-1) would be necessary to achieve the same level of codling moth control provided by a standard pheromone treatment with passive reservoir dispensers. The need for only a few aerosol emitters, 2.5-5 units ha(-1) , mitigates the cost of labor required to hand-apply hundreds of passive reservoir dispensers; however, a potential weakness in using this technology is that the low deployment density may leave areas of little or no pheromone coverage, where mate finding may occur. This technology is likely to benefit substantially from treatment of large contiguous blocks of crop"
Keywords:"Animals Dodecanol/administration & dosage/*analogs & derivatives Female Insect Control/*instrumentation/*methods Male Malus/parasitology Moths/*drug effects Sex Attractants/*administration & dosage Sexual Behavior, Animal/drug effects Tortricidae disrupti;"
Notes:"MedlineMcGhee, Peter S Gut, Larry J Miller, James R eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2014/01/25 Pest Manag Sci. 2014 Dec; 70(12):1859-62. doi: 10.1002/ps.3732. Epub 2014 Mar 10"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024