Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractBinding properties of pheromone-binding protein 1 from the common cutworm Spodoptera litura    Next AbstractIdentification and characterization of three chemosensory receptor families in the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera »

Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol


Title:Functional differentiation of pheromone-binding proteins in the common cutworm Spodoptera litura
Author(s):Liu NY; Liu CC; Dong SL;
Address:"Education Ministry Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Crop Diseases and Pests, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China"
Journal Title:Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol
Year:2013
Volume:20130316
Issue:2
Page Number:254 - 262
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.03.016
ISSN/ISBN:1531-4332 (Electronic) 1095-6433 (Linking)
Abstract:"Pheromone-binding proteins (PBPs), a sub-family of odorant-binding proteins, are thought primarily to bind and transport the sex pheromones in moths. Considering multiple components of sex pheromone and multiple PBP genes exist in a single species, PBPs may contribute to the discrimination of different sex pheromone components. However, so far this discrimination is still unclear. Our previous ligand-binding assays showed that Spodoptera litura PBP1 (SlitPBP1) did not exhibit an obvious binding specificity among different sex pheromone components. In this study, binding specificity of the other two PBPs in S. litura (SlitPBP2 and SlitPBP3) was further investigated. As a result, SlitPBP2 was capable of binding all four sex pheromone components with similar affinities; whereas SlitPBP3 showed very weak binding affinities to them except Z9,E12-14:Ac. Similar results were also obtained from studied pheromone analogs, to which SlitPBP2 showed much stronger affinities than SlitPBP3. However, both SlitPBP2 and SlitPBP3 exhibited overall weaker affinities to sex pheromones and their analogs than SlitPBP1. In addition, quantitative real time PCR showed that three SlitPBP genes exhibited a very different sex-biased expression in adult antenna with male-biased for SlitPBP1 and SlitPBP2 while female-biased for SlitPBP3. Finally, ligand-binding assays indicated that the two SlitPBPs showed a similar pH-dependent conformational change as reported SlitPBP1, but these three SlitPBPs showed different behavior across a pH range or something similar. Taken together, our data suggest that in S. litura PBP1 and PBP2 may play critical roles in the perception of female sex pheromones, but do not show an obvious discriminative ability among different sex pheromone components; whereas PBP3 may have other functions"
Keywords:"Amino Acid Sequence Animals Binding, Competitive Carrier Proteins/chemistry/genetics/*metabolism Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel Female Gene Expression Hydrogen-Ion Concentration Insect Proteins/chemistry/genetics/*metabolism Ligands Male Models, Mole;"
Notes:"MedlineLiu, Nai-Yong Liu, Cheng-Cheng Dong, Shuang-Lin eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/03/20 Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2013 Jun; 165(2):254-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.03.016. Epub 2013 Mar 16"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024