Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractControlled Encapsulation of Gold Nanoparticles into Zr-Metal-Organic Frameworks with Improved Detection Limitation of Volatile Organic Compounds via Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering    Next AbstractDisturbance of normal cell cycle progression enhances the establishment of transcriptional silencing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae »

Talanta


Title:Evaluation of adsorbents for volatile methyl siloxanes sampling based on the determination of their breakthrough volume
Author(s):Lamaa L; Ferronato C; Fine L; Jaber F; Chovelon JM;
Address:"Universite Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5256, IRCELYON, Institut de recherches sur la catalyse et l'environnement de Lyon, 2 avenue Albert Einstein, F-69626 Villeurbanne, France; Conseil National de la Recherche Scientifique, Commission Libanaise de l'Energie Atomique, Laboratoire d'analyse de Pesticides et de Polluants Organiques, B.P. 11-8282, Riad El Solh, 1107 2260 Beyrouth, Lebanon. Electronic address: lina_lamaa@hotmail.com"
Journal Title:Talanta
Year:2013
Volume:20130629
Issue:
Page Number:881 - 886
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.06.045
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3573 (Electronic) 0039-9140 (Linking)
Abstract:"Volatile methyl siloxanes (VMS) have been detected in many different atmospheres such as biogas, sewage sludge, landfill gas, gasoline and ambient air. In these different atmospheres, their presence can involve several contamination problems and negative effects in industrial processes, their identification and quantification become a real challenge. Up to now there is no standardized procedure for VMS quantification, the sampling step remaining the major obstacle. Sampling gas through sorbent tube followed by analysis on TD-GC-MS is one of the reliable possibilities. It gathers sampling and preconcentration in one step and allows discrimination between all VMS, despite the difficulty to choose the appropriate adsorbent in order to avoid loss of analytes during sampling. In this context, this work deals with the comparison of different types of adsorbents based on the determination of the VMS breakthrough volume (BV). Although Tenax TA is the most widely used adsorbent, experiments show low BV values for the lightest VMS. At 25 degrees C, the BV of TMS and L2 are, respectively, 0.2 and 0.44 L g(-1) which can contribute to an underestimation in concentration during their quantification. Carbosieve SIII usually used for C2-C5, did not adsorb light VMS as it was expected, and breakthrough volume obtained for VMS are more than ten times less than the values obtained for Tenax. On other hand, Chromosorb 106 and Carboxen 1000 in association with Carbotrap C and Carbotrap proved to be appropriated for VMS sampling, due to the high breakthrough volumes obtained for the lightest compounds comparing to the other adsorbents. The BVs of TMS for Carboxen 1000 and Chromosorb 106 are 1.2 x 10(4) and 39 L g(-1), respectively, and 49 x 10(4) and 1142 L g(-1) for L2, respectively"
Keywords:Adsorption Air Pollutants/*isolation & purification Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Polymers/*chemistry Polystyrenes/*chemistry Siloxanes/*isolation & purification Specimen Handling Volatile Organic Compounds/*isolation & purification Adsorbents Brea;
Notes:"MedlineLamaa, L Ferronato, C Fine, L Jaber, F Chovelon, J M eng Netherlands 2013/09/24 Talanta. 2013 Oct 15; 115:881-6. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2013.06.045. Epub 2013 Jun 29"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024