Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInfrared spectroscopic signature of a hydroperoxyalkyl radical (*QOOH)    Next AbstractAdvances in Semiochemical Repellents to Mitigate Host Mortality From the Spruce Beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) »

J Econ Entomol


Title:3-Methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one for area and individual tree protection against spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) attack in the southern Rocky Mountains
Author(s):Hansen EM; Munson AS; Blackford DC; Graves AD; Coleman TW; Baggett LS;
Address:"US-Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 860 North 1200 East, Logan, UT 84321. US-Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, 4746 South 1900 East, Ogden, UT 84403. US-Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, 333 Broadway Boulevard SE, Albuquerque, NM 87102. US-Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 240 West Prospect Street, Fort Collins, CO 80526"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2017
Volume:110
Issue:5
Page Number:2140 - 2148
DOI: 10.1093/jee/tox208
ISSN/ISBN:1938-291X (Electronic) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"We tested 3-methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (MCH) and an Acer kairomone blend (AKB) as repellent semiochemicals for area and single tree protection to prevent spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis Kirby) attacks at locations in Utah and New Mexico. In the area protection study, we compared host infestation rates of MCH applications at three densities (20, 40, and 80 g MCH ha-1) against a control treatment over 0.64 ha plots centered within ~1.25 ha treatment blocks. All treatments included two baited funnel traps within the plot to assure spruce beetle pressure. Following beetle attack, plots were surveyed for new spruce beetle attacks and to quantify stand characteristics. The probability of more severe spruce beetle attacks was significantly reduced, by ~50%, in each of the MCH area treatments compared with the control treatment but there was no significant treatment difference among the MCH deployment densities. For the single tree protection study, we compared attack rates of MCH, Acer kairomone blend (AKB), and MCH plus AKB on spruce beetle-baited trees against bait-only trees. Each treatment was applied over a range of host diameters to test for host size effects. Seventy-five percent of control trees were mass-attacked, about one-third of MCH- and AKB-alone spruce was mass-attacked, and no MCH plus AKB spruce were mass-attacked. These results suggest that MCH alone is a marginal area and single tree protectant against spruce beetle but that deployment with other repellents can significantly increase treatment efficacy"
Keywords:Animals *Cyclohexanes *Insect Repellents New Mexico *Pheromones *Picea Utah *Weevils Dendroctonus rufipennis Engelmann spruce bark beetle management pheromone semiochemicals;
Notes:"MedlineHansen, E Matthew Munson, A Steven Blackford, Darren C Graves, Andrew D Coleman, Tom W Baggett, L Scott eng Evaluation Study England 2017/09/30 J Econ Entomol. 2017 Oct 1; 110(5):2140-2148. doi: 10.1093/jee/tox208"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024