Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractExpression of acid phosphatase-beta-galactosidase hybrid proteins prevents translocation by depleting a soluble factor    Next AbstractEffects of cyclodextrins on the flavor of goat milk and its yogurt »

Naturwissenschaften


Title:"Cranial biomechanics of Diplodocus (Dinosauria, Sauropoda): testing hypotheses of feeding behaviour in an extinct megaherbivore"
Author(s):Young MT; Rayfield EJ; Holliday CM; Witmer LM; Button DJ; Upchurch P; Barrett PM;
Address:"School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, UK"
Journal Title:Naturwissenschaften
Year:2012
Volume:20120712
Issue:8
Page Number:637 - 643
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-012-0944-y
ISSN/ISBN:1432-1904 (Electronic) 0028-1042 (Linking)
Abstract:"Sauropod dinosaurs were the largest terrestrial herbivores and pushed at the limits of vertebrate biomechanics and physiology. Sauropods exhibit high craniodental diversity in ecosystems where numerous species co-existed, leading to the hypothesis that this biodiversity is linked to niche subdivision driven by ecological specialisation. Here, we quantitatively investigate feeding behaviour hypotheses for the iconic sauropod Diplodocus. Biomechanical modelling, using finite element analysis, was used to examine the performance of the Diplodocus skull. Three feeding behaviours were modelled: muscle-driven static biting, branch stripping and bark stripping. The skull was found to be 'over engineered' for static biting, overall experiencing low stress with only the dentition enduring high stress. When branch stripping, the skull, similarly, is under low stress, with little appreciable difference between those models. When simulated for bark stripping, the skull experiences far greater stresses, especially in the teeth and at the jaw joint. Therefore, we refute the bark-stripping hypothesis, while the hypotheses of branch stripping and/or precision biting are both consistent with our findings, showing that branch stripping is a biomechanically plausible feeding behaviour for diplodocids. Interestingly, in all simulations, peak stress is observed in the premaxillary-maxillary 'lateral plates', supporting the hypothesis that these structures evolved to dissipate stress induced while feeding. These results lead us to conclude that the aberrant craniodental form of Diplodocus was adapted for food procurement rather than resisting high bite forces"
Keywords:Animals Biomechanical Phenomena Diet Dinosaurs/*anatomy & histology/*physiology *Feeding Behavior Finite Element Analysis *Fossils *Herbivory Skull/anatomy & histology;
Notes:"MedlineYoung, Mark T Rayfield, Emily J Holliday, Casey M Witmer, Lawrence M Button, David J Upchurch, Paul Barrett, Paul M eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Germany 2012/07/14 Naturwissenschaften. 2012 Aug; 99(8):637-43. doi: 10.1007/s00114-012-0944-y. Epub 2012 Jul 12"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024