Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractLipoxygenase Pathways in Diatoms: Occurrence and Correlation with Grazer Toxicity in Four Benthic Species    Next AbstractA further tool to monitor the coffee roasting process: aroma composition and chemical indices »

J Occup Environ Hyg


Title:Cleaning workers' exposure to volatile organic compounds and particulate matter during floor polish removal and reapplication
Author(s):Ruokolainen J; Hyttinen M;
Address:"Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland , Kuopio , Finland"
Journal Title:J Occup Environ Hyg
Year:2019
Volume:20190807
Issue:10
Page Number:685 - 693
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1646915
ISSN/ISBN:1545-9632 (Electronic) 1545-9624 (Linking)
Abstract:"The floor polish removal (FPR) and reapplication (FPA) are important cleaning tasks in public buildings that have hard floor surfaces. Usually, the FPR and FPA are conducted once or twice a year, during the periodic cleaning of these buildings. The FPR can be performed either chemically (CFPR) or by using dry scrubber (DFPR), when the polish is ground from the floor. In this study, cleaning workers' exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM) during the FPR and FPA, and the differences in the exposures between the two FPR methods were investigated. In total, three buildings located in Central Finland were included, and total of six cleaning workers (two per building) participated in the study. In Buildings 1 and 2, the CFPR and FPA were performed and in Building 3, the DFPR was conducted. TVOC (total volatile organic compounds) concentrations in the breathing zone of the workers during the CFPR were 8,740 and 390 microg/m(3) (SD 3,290 and 180 microg/m(3)) for Buildings 1 and 2, respectively. During the DFPR in Building 3, the average TVOC concentration was 400 microg/m(3) (SD 180 microg/m(3), stationary sampling). The TVOC concentrations during the FPA were high, 1,640 and 2,170 microg/m(3) on average (SD 1,570 and 930 microg/m(3)) for Buildings 1 and 2, respectively. Glycol ethers were the most prominent VOCs during the CFPR and FPA, whereas carboxylic acids were the most common during the DFPR. The inhalable dust concentrations in the workers' breathing zone were noticeably higher during the DFPR (1.55 mg/m(3) on average, SD 0.01 mg/m(3)) than the CFPR (0.24 mg/m(3) on average, SD 0.05 mg/m(3)). Finnish occupational exposure limit value for organic inhalable dust is 5 mg/m(3). As the products used during the CFPR and FPA contain glycol ethers and ethanolamines that are absorbed via the skin as well, the use of skin protection is recommended. Whereas the use of FFP3 respirators and skin protection are recommended during the DFPR to prevent the PM exposure"
Keywords:"Air Pollutants, Occupational/*analysis Carboxylic Acids/analysis Dust/*analysis Ethers/analysis Floors and Floorcoverings Glycols/analysis Household Work/*methods Humans Industrial Oils Inhalation Exposure/*analysis/prevention & control Occupational Expos;"
Notes:"MedlineRuokolainen, Joonas Hyttinen, Marko eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2019/08/08 J Occup Environ Hyg. 2019 Oct; 16(10):685-693. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1646915. Epub 2019 Aug 7"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-12-2024