Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAroma correlation assisted volatilome coupled network analysis strategy to unveil main aroma-active volatiles of Rosa roxburghii    Next Abstract"Methods for monitoring outdoor populations of house flies, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae)" »

Environ Microbiol


Title:Analysis of methanotrophic communities in landfill biofilters using diagnostic microarray
Author(s):Gebert J; Stralis-Pavese N; Alawi M; Bodrossy L;
Address:"University of Hamburg, Institute of Soil Science, Allende-Platz 2, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany. j.gebert@ifb.uni-hamburg.de"
Journal Title:Environ Microbiol
Year:2008
Volume:20080227
Issue:5
Page Number:1175 - 1188
DOI: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01534.x
ISSN/ISBN:1462-2920 (Electronic) 1462-2912 (Linking)
Abstract:"Biofilters operated for the microbial oxidation of landfill methane at two sites in Northern Germany were analysed for the composition of their methanotrophic community by means of diagnostic microarray targeting the pmoA gene of methanotrophs. The gas emitted from site Francop (FR) contained the typical principal components (CH4, CO2, N2) only, while the gas at the second site Muggenburger Strasse (MU) was additionally charged with non-methane volatile organic compounds (NMVOCs). Methane oxidation activity measured at 22 degrees C varied between 7 and 103 microg CH4 (g dw)(-1) h(-1) at site FR and between 0.9 and 21 microg CH4 (g dw)(-1) h(-1) at site MU, depending on the depth considered. The calculated size of the active methanotrophic population varied between 3 x 10(9) and 5 x 10(11) cells (g dw)(-1) for biofilter FR and 4 x 10(8) to 1 x 10(10) cells (g dw)(-1) for biofilter MU. The methanotrophic community in both biofilters as well as the methanotrophs present in the landfill gas at site FR was strongly dominated by type II organisms, presumably as a result of high methane loads, low copper concentration and low nitrogen availability. Within each biofilter, community composition differed markedly with depth, reflecting either the different conditions of diffusive oxygen supply or the properties of the two layers of materials used in the filters or both. The two biofilter communities differed significantly. Type I methanotrophs were detected in biofilter FR but not in biofilter MU. The type II community in biofilter FR was dominated by Methylocystis species, whereas the biofilter at site MU hosted a high abundance of Methylosinus species while showing less overall methanotroph diversity. It is speculated that the differing composition of the type II population at site MU is driven by the presence of NMVOCs in the landfill gas fed to the biofilter, selecting for organisms capable of co-oxidative degradation of these compounds"
Keywords:*Ecosystem Methane/*metabolism Methylocystaceae/genetics/growth & development/isolation & purification/metabolism Methylosinus/genetics/growth & development/isolation & purification/metabolism Mixed Function Oxygenases/*genetics/metabolism Oligonucleotide;
Notes:"MedlineGebert, Julia Stralis-Pavese, Nancy Alawi, Mashal Bodrossy, Levente eng England 2008/03/04 Environ Microbiol. 2008 May; 10(5):1175-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01534.x. Epub 2008 Feb 27"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024