Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPropheromones derived from codlemone    Next AbstractTheoretical chemical ionization rate constants of the concurrent reactions of hydronium ions (H(3) O(+) ) and oxygen ions (O 2+ ) with selected organic iodides »

Arthropod Plant Interact


Title:Visual discrimination between two sexually deceptive Ophrys species by a bee pollinator
Author(s):Streinzer M; Ellis T; Paulus HF; Spaethe J;
Address:"Department of Evolutionary Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria, martin.streinzer@univie.ac.at"
Journal Title:Arthropod Plant Interact
Year:2010
Volume:4
Issue:3
Page Number:141 - 148
DOI: 10.1007/s11829-010-9093-4
ISSN/ISBN:1872-8855 (Print) 1872-8847 (Electronic)
Abstract:"Almost all species of the orchid genus Ophrys are pollinated by sexual deception. The orchids mimic the sex pheromone of receptive female insects, mainly hymenopterans, in order to attract males seeking to copulate. Most Ophrys species have achromatic flowers, but some exhibit a coloured perianth and a bright, conspicuous labellum pattern. We recently showed that the pink perianth of Ophrys heldreichii flowers increases detectability by its pollinator, males of the long-horned bee Eucera berlandi. Here we tested the hypothesis that the bright, complex labellum pattern mimics the female of the pollinator to increase attractiveness toward males. In a dual-choice test we offered E. berlandi males an O. heldreichii flower and a flower from O. dictynnae, which also exhibits a pinkish perianth but no conspicuous labellum pattern. Both flowers were housed in UV-transmitting acrylic glass boxes to exclude olfactory signals. Males significantly preferred O. heldreichii to O. dictynnae flowers. In a second experiment, we replaced the perianth of both flowers with identical artificial perianths made from pink card, so that only the labellum differed between the two flower stimuli. Males then chose between both stimuli at random, suggesting that the presence of a labellum pattern does not affect their choice. Spectral measurements revealed higher colour contrast with the background of the perianth of O. heldreichii compared to O. dictynnae, but no difference in green receptor-specific contrast or brightness. Our results show that male choice is guided by the chromatic contrast of the perianth during the initial flower approach but is not affected by the presence of a labellum pattern. Instead, we hypothesise that the labellum pattern is involved in aversive learning during post-copulatory behaviour and used by the orchid as a strategy to increase outcrossing"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEStreinzer, M Ellis, T Paulus, H F Spaethe, J eng P 21521/FWF_/Austrian Science Fund FWF/Austria Netherlands 2011/04/26 Arthropod Plant Interact. 2010 Sep; 4(3):141-148. doi: 10.1007/s11829-010-9093-4"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024