Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractSpecific sterols required for the internalization step of endocytosis in yeast    Next AbstractPhysiological and oral parameters contribute prediction of retronasal aroma release in an elderly cohort »

J Agric Food Chem


Title:Understanding the role of saliva in aroma release from wine by using static and dynamic headspace conditions
Author(s):Munoz-Gonzalez C; Feron G; Guichard E; Rodriguez-Bencomo JJ; Martin-Alvarez PJ; Moreno-Arribas MV; Pozo-Bayon MA;
Address:"Instituto de Investigacion en Ciencias de la Alimentacion (CIAL) (CSIC-UAM) , C/Nicolas Cabrera 9, 28049 Madrid, Spain"
Journal Title:J Agric Food Chem
Year:2014
Volume:20140808
Issue:33
Page Number:8274 - 8288
DOI: 10.1021/jf503503b
ISSN/ISBN:1520-5118 (Electronic) 0021-8561 (Linking)
Abstract:"The aim of this work was to determine the role of saliva in wine aroma release by using static and dynamic headspace conditions. In the latter conditions, two different sampling points (t = 0 and t = 10 min) corresponding with oral (25.5 degrees C) and postoral phases (36 degrees C) were monitored. Both methodologies were applied to reconstituted dearomatized white and red wines with different nonvolatile wine matrix compositions and a synthetic wine (without matrix effect). All of the wines had the same ethanol concentration and were spiked with a mixture of 45 aroma compounds covering a wide range of physicochemical characteristics at typical wine concentrations. Two types of saliva (human and artificial) or control samples (water) were added to the wines. The adequacy of the two headspace methodologies for the purposes of the study (repeatability, linear ranges, determination coefficients, etc.) was previously determined. After application of different chemometric analysis (ANOVA, LSD, PCA), results showed a significant effect of saliva on aroma release dependent on saliva type (differences between artificial and human) and on wine matrix using static headspace conditions. Red wines were more affected than white and synthetic wines by saliva, specifically human saliva, which provoked a reduction in aroma release for most of the assayed aroma compounds independent of their chemical structure. The application of dynamic headspace conditions using a saliva bioreactor at the two different sampling points (t = 0 and t = 10 min) showed a lesser but significant effect of saliva than matrix composition and a high influence of temperature (oral and postoral phases) on aroma release"
Keywords:Adult Female Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Humans Male Odorants/*analysis Saliva/*chemistry Volatile Organic Compounds/*chemistry Wine/*analysis aroma release dynamic HS-SPME-GC/MS saliva static HS-SPME-GC/MS wine;
Notes:"MedlineMunoz-Gonzalez, Carolina Feron, Gilles Guichard, Elisabeth Rodriguez-Bencomo, J Jose Martin-Alvarez, Pedro J Moreno-Arribas, M Victoria Pozo-Bayon, M Angeles eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2014/07/31 J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Aug 20; 62(33):8274-88. doi: 10.1021/jf503503b. Epub 2014 Aug 8"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024