Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractVolatile profile of fermented sausages with commercial probiotic strains and fructooligosaccharides    Next AbstractUnique neural coding of crucial versus irrelevant plant odors in a hawkmoth »

J Exp Biol


Title:Olfactory coding in five moth species from two families
Author(s):Bisch-Knaden S; Carlsson MA; Sugimoto Y; Schubert M; Missbach C; Sachse S; Hansson BS;
Address:"Department of Evolutionary Neuroethology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, D-07745 Jena, Germany. sbisch-knaden@ice.mpg.de"
Journal Title:J Exp Biol
Year:2012
Volume:215
Issue:Pt 9
Page Number:1542 - 1551
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.068064
ISSN/ISBN:1477-9145 (Electronic) 0022-0949 (Linking)
Abstract:"The aim of the present study was to determine what impact phylogeny and life history might have on the coding of odours in the brain. Using three species of hawk moths (Sphingidae) and two species of owlet moths (Noctuidae), we visualized neural activity patterns in the antennal lobe, the first olfactory neuropil in insects, evoked by a set of ecologically relevant plant volatiles. Our results suggest that even between the two phylogenetically distant moth families, basic olfactory coding features are similar. But we also found different coding strategies in the moths' antennal lobe; namely, more specific patterns for chemically similar odorants in the two noctuid species than in the three sphingid species tested. This difference demonstrates the impact of the phylogenetic distance between species from different families despite some parallel life history traits found in both families. Furthermore, pronounced differences in larval and adult diet among the sphingids did not translate into differences in the olfactory code; instead, the three species had almost identical coding patterns"
Keywords:"Animals Brain Mapping/methods Calcium/metabolism Female Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Imaging, Three-Dimensional Immunohistochemistry/methods Male Microscopy, Fluorescence/methods Moths/*physiology Odorants Optics and Photonics/methods Pheromones/ph;"
Notes:"MedlineBisch-Knaden, Sonja Carlsson, Mikael A Sugimoto, Yuki Schubert, Marco Missbach, Christine Sachse, Silke Hansson, Bill S eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2012/04/13 J Exp Biol. 2012 May 1; 215(Pt 9):1542-51. doi: 10.1242/jeb.068064"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-09-2024