Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractComparison of tomatillo and tomato volatile compounds in the headspace by selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS)    Next Abstract[Determination of 15 volatile organic compound residues in cosmetics by headspace gas chromatography] »

J Food Sci


Title:Comparison of volatile release in tomatillo and different varieties of tomato during chewing
Author(s):Xu Y; Barringer S;
Address:"Dept. of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State Univ., 2015 Fyffe Rd., Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA"
Journal Title:J Food Sci
Year:2010
Volume:75
Issue:4
Page Number:C352 - C358
DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01575.x
ISSN/ISBN:1750-3841 (Electronic) 0022-1147 (Linking)
Abstract:"The release of volatiles from tomatillos (Physalis ixocarpa Brot.) and tomatoes in the mouthspace and nosespace was measured in real-time using selected ion flow tube mass spectrometry (SIFT-MS). (Z)-3-Hexenal, (E)-2-hexenal, hexanal, and 1-penten-3-one increased, while isobutyl alcohol, nonanal, and methylbutanal showed no significant change in the first 30 s of chewing. Cherry tomato released more (E)-2-hexenal, (Z)-3-hexenal, and 1-penten-3-one than tomatillo, Roma tomato, and vine-ripened tomato during chewing. The proportion of the average concentration of volatiles in the mouthspace after swallowing to before swallowing (MSas/MSbs) varied from 2.8% to 73.9% between different volatiles and varieties. Methylbutanal, hexanal, and nonanal were retained at a higher percentage in the mouth after swallowing than (Z)-3-hexenal, (E)-2-hexenal, 1-penten-3-one, and isobutyl alcohol. The proportion of the average volatile concentration in the mouthspace, to the headspace in a glass container (MS/HS) of 1-penten-3-one, hexanal, methylbutanal, and nonanal, and the proportion of nosespace to headspace (NS/HS) for 1-penten-3-one, hexanal, (Z)-3-hexenal, and nonanal was significantly higher in tomatillo than in tomatoes. There was no difference between tomatoes of different varieties in NS/HS ratio. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The real-time volatile release from tomatillos and tomatoes was measured and compared. The information obtained on the dynamic generation of volatile compounds provides a better understanding of volatile release in the headspace of tomatillo and tomatoes. The compounds and their volatile release patterns were similar for the tomatillo and tomatoes. The green aldehydes released during chewing were not significantly higher than most tomato varieties, except for Roma tomatoes. Cherry tomato released relatively more volatiles during chewing, whereas Roma tomatoes were generally poor in mouthspace volatiles. The lingering of volatiles in the mouth after swallowing was different for different volatiles and varieties, which may appear as a sensory difference detected by consumers"
Keywords:Adult Aldehydes/analysis/chemistry Butanols/analysis/chemistry Deglutition Exhalation Fruit/*chemistry Humans Kinetics Solanum lycopersicum/*chemistry Male Mass Spectrometry *Mastication Mouth/chemistry Nasal Cavity/chemistry Pentanones/analysis/chemistry;
Notes:"MedlineXu, Yichi Barringer, Sheryl eng Comparative Study 2010/06/16 J Food Sci. 2010 May; 75(4):C352-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01575.x"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024