Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMultidimensional gas chromatography-olfactometry for the identification and prioritization of malodors from confined animal feeding operations    Next AbstractAnalysis of flavor and taste attributes differences treated by chemical preservatives: a case study in strawberry fruits treated by 1-methylcyclopropene and chlorine dioxide »

J Chem Ecol


Title:"Ability of honeybee, Apis mellifera, to detect and discriminate odors of varieties of canola (Brassica rapa and Brassica napus) and snapdragon flowers (Antirrhinum majus)"
Author(s):Wright GA; Skinner BD; Smith BH;
Address:"Department of Entomology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1220, USA"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2002
Volume:28
Issue:4
Page Number:721 - 740
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015232608858
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Honeybees (Apis mellifera) use odors to identify and discriminate among flowers during foraging. This series of experiments examined the ability of bees to detect and discriminate among the floral odors of different varieties of two species of canola (Brassica rapa and Brassica napus) and also among three varieties of snapdragons (Antirhinnum majus). Individual worker honeybees were trained using a proboscis extension assay. The ability of bees to distinguish a floral odor from an air stimulus during training increased as the number of flowers used during training increased. Bees conditioned to the odor of one variety of flower were asked to discriminate it from the odors of other flowers in two different training assays. Bees were unable to discriminate among flowers at the level of variety in a randomized presentation of a reinforced floral odor and an unreinforced floral odor. In the second type of assay, bees were trained with one floral variety for 40 trials without reinforcement and then tested with the same variety or with other varieties and species. If a bee had been trained with a variety of canola, it was unable to differentiate the odor of one canola flower from the odor of other canola flowers, but it could differentiate canola from the odor of a snapdragon flower. Bees trained with the odor of snapdragon flowers readily differentiated the odor of one variety of a snapdragon from the odor of other varieties of snapdragons and also canola flowers. Our study suggests that both intensity and odor quality affect the ability of honeybees to differentiate among floral perfumes"
Keywords:"Animals Antirrhinum/*physiology Appetitive Behavior Bees/*physiology Brassica napus/*physiology Brassica rapa/*physiology Conditioning, Classical/physiology Dietary Sucrose Discrimination Learning/physiology Flowers/physiology Generalization, Stimulus *Od;"
Notes:"MedlineWright, Geraldine A Skinner, Bethany D Smith, Brian H eng 9 R01 RR14166/RR/NCRR NIH HHS/ Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 2002/05/31 J Chem Ecol. 2002 Apr; 28(4):721-40. doi: 10.1023/a:1015232608858"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024