Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAuthentication of key aroma compounds in apple using stable isotope approach    Next AbstractConstruction of IsoVoc Database for the Authentication of Natural Flavours »

Talanta


Title:Compound-specific carbon and hydrogen isotope analysis of volatile organic compounds using headspace solid-phase microextraction
Author(s):Strojnik L; Camin F; Ogrinc N;
Address:"Department of Environmental Sciences, Jozef Stefan Institute, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Department of Food Quality and Nutrition, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach (FEM), Via E. Mach 1, 38010, San Michele All'Adige (TN), Italy; Center Agriculture Food Environment (C3A), University of Trento, Via Mach 1, 38010, San Michele All'Adige (TN), Italy. Department of Environmental Sciences, Jozef Stefan Institute, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia; Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Electronic address: nives.ogrinc@ijs.si"
Journal Title:Talanta
Year:2020
Volume:20200619
Issue:
Page Number:121264 -
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121264
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3573 (Electronic) 0039-9140 (Linking)
Abstract:"Natural flavouring materials are in high demand, and a premium price is paid for all-natural flavourings, making them vulnerable to fraud. At present, compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) is perhaps the most sophisticated tool for determining flavour authenticity. Despite promising results, the method is not widely used, and the results are limited to the most common volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This paper describes a robust protocol for on-line measurements of delta(13)C and delta(2)H using HS-SPME coupled with GC-C-IRMS and GC-HTC-IRMS for common fruit VOCs. To achieve reproducible and accurate results, a combination of a peak size/linearity correction with drift correction were used. Finally, the results were normalised by multiple point linear regression using the known and measured values of reference materials. Special care was taken to avoid irreproducible isotopic fractionation and the effects of equilibration, adsorption, desorption times and temperatures on delta(13)C or delta(2)H values were examined. Method validation was performed, and the average combined measurement uncertainty (MU) was 0.42 per thousand. All the delta(13)C(VPDB) values were below +/-3*MU, regardless of analytical conditions. In contrast, for delta(2)H(VSMOW-SLAP) values, only low temperature (30 degrees C) with equilibration time (15 min) and shorter adsorption time (between 10 and 20 min) can produce an isotopic difference of <10 per thousand. Therefore, method optimisation can minimise MU, and data normalisation and method validation are essential for obtaining meaningful data for use in flavour authenticity studies"
Keywords:Carbon Compound specific isotope analysis (CSIA) Fractionation Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) Hydrogen Method validation;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEStrojnik, Lidija Camin, Federica Ogrinc, Nives eng Netherlands 2020/09/06 Talanta. 2020 Nov 1; 219:121264. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2020.121264. Epub 2020 Jun 19"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024