Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractComparative Metabolite Profiling of Traditional and Commercial Vinegars in Korea    Next AbstractLongitudinal variations in indoor VOC concentrations after moving into new apartments and indoor source characterization »

Ann Work Expo Health


Title:Estimating exposures from spray products using robotic simulations
Author(s):Shin MK; Qian H; Lee JE; Sentis L; Maberti SI;
Address:"ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences Inc., 1545 Route 22 East, Annandale, NJ 08801, United States. The Human Centered Robotics Lab, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, The University of Texas at Austin, 2617 Wichita Dr. C0600, Lab 4.108, Austin, TX 78712, United States. Cofounder of Apptronik, 11701 Stonehollow 4, STE 150, Austin, TX 78758, United States. ExxonMobil Biomedical Sciences Inc., 22777 Springwoods Village Pkwy, Spring, TX 77389, United States"
Journal Title:Ann Work Expo Health
Year:2023
Volume:67
Issue:8
Page Number:979 - 989
DOI: 10.1093/annweh/wxad049
ISSN/ISBN:2398-7316 (Electronic) 2398-7308 (Print) 2398-7308 (Linking)
Abstract:"There is an increasing need for exposure data to enable more precise information for risk estimates and improved public health protection. While personal monitoring data are preferred, it is often difficult to collect due to the resources needed to complete a human research study. In this study, we successfully programmed a robotic arm to mimic human use (spraying) of a fabric crafts protector (FCP) and human cleaning (spraying and wiping) of a glass pane with glass cleaner (GC). The robot was then used in place of human subjects to assess inhalation exposures to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during the use of the FCP and GC. Air sampling data were collected while the robot used the products to estimate personal exposures to VOCs. Average VOC concentrations were 1.57 ppm for FCP spraying and 0.17 ppm for GC spraying and wiping. During FCP spraying, average acetone concentrations were 0.88 ppm and average isopropyl alcohol concentrations were 0.26 ppm. During GC spraying and wiping, average 2-butoxyethanol concentrations were 0.15 ppm. Air sampling data were found to be within the range of data reported in the literature during human use of similar glass cleaning products. No data was found in the literature during use of fabric protector spray products. This study contributes exposure measurement data with detailed contextual information to help characterize inhalation exposures during the use of 2 spray products. In addition, the study offers a systematic, efficient method for generating exposure data which can be used to improve health and safety risk assessments used for public health protection"
Keywords:Humans *Robotic Surgical Procedures *Robotics *Occupational Exposure 2-Propanol Acetone *Volatile Organic Compounds air sampling exposure data fabric protector glass cleaner volatile organic compounds;
Notes:"MedlineShin, Mi K Qian, Hua Lee, Jee-Eun Sentis, Luis Maberti, Silvia I eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2023/09/05 Ann Work Expo Health. 2023 Sep 21; 67(8):979-989. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxad049"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 28-09-2024