Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractLearning about microbial language: possible interactions mediated by microbial volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and relevance to understanding Malassezia spp. metabolism    Next AbstractCharacterization of the aroma profile and key odorants of the Spanish PDO wine vinegars »

Food Res Int


Title:A comparative study of the volatile profile of wine vinegars with protected designation of origin by headspace stir bar sorptive extraction
Author(s):Rios-Reina R; Segura-Borrego MP; Garcia-Gonzalez DL; Morales ML; Callejon RM;
Address:"Dpto. de Nutricion y Bromatologia, Toxicologia y Medicina Legal, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Sevilla, C/P. Garcia Gonzalez n degrees 2, E-41012 Sevilla, Spain. Instituto de la Grasa (CSIC), Campus University Pablo de Olavide - Building 46, Ctra. de Utrera, km. 1, E-41013 Sevilla, Spain. Dpto. de Nutricion y Bromatologia, Toxicologia y Medicina Legal, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Sevilla, C/P. Garcia Gonzalez n degrees 2, E-41012 Sevilla, Spain. Electronic address: rcallejon@us.es"
Journal Title:Food Res Int
Year:2019
Volume:20190502
Issue:
Page Number:298 - 310
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.04.071
ISSN/ISBN:1873-7145 (Electronic) 0963-9969 (Linking)
Abstract:"The characteristic volatile profile of the Spanish Vinagre de Jerez (VJ), Vinagre de Condado de Huelva (VC) and Vinagre de Montilla-Moriles (VMM) protected designation of origin (PDO) wine vinegars has been studied and compared for the first time by headspace stir bar sorptive extraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HSSE-GC-MS). The possible markers of each category and PDO were assessed. Acetates were the majority group in all vinegars, while ketones, C(13)-norisoprenoids and volatile phenols showed significant differences between the three PDOs. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), heatmap and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) were performed. According to these results, 1-heptanol, methyl nonanoate, 2-methylbutanoic acid, 2,2,6-trimethyl-cyclohexanone, trans-2-decenal, eucalyptol and alpha-terpineol, were the most significant compounds for differentiating of VC, diacetyl and acetoin, ethyl 3-ethoxypropanoate, 2- and 3-heptanone, 2-methyl-1-hexadecanol, 1-octen-3-ol, p-Cresol and camphene for VMM; and beta-damascenone, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural, 3-heptanol, trans-2-hexen-1-ol and trans-2-hexen-1-yl acetate for VJ. Classification results showed that 100% of PDO samples were correctly classified, reaffirming the utility of the volatile profiles for classifying and authenticating wine vinegar PDOs"
Keywords:Acetic Acid/*analysis Bicyclic Monoterpenes/analysis Butyrates/analysis Cresols/analysis Cyclohexane Monoterpenes/analysis Discriminant Analysis Eucalyptol/analysis Food Handling Furaldehyde/analogs & derivatives Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Hepta;
Notes:"MedlineRios-Reina, Rocio Segura-Borrego, M Pilar Garcia-Gonzalez, Diego L Morales, M Lourdes Callejon, Raquel M eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Canada 2019/07/10 Food Res Int. 2019 Sep; 123:298-310. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.04.071. Epub 2019 May 2"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024