Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAssessing exposure of semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) in car cabins: Current understanding and future challenges in developing a standardized methodology    Next AbstractAltered sexual and social behaviors in trp2 mutant mice »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Comparison of walking locomotory reactions of two forms ofCallosobruchus maculatus males subjected to female sex pheromone stimulation (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)
Author(s):Lextrait P; Biemont JC; Pouzat J;
Address:"Faculte des Sciences, Institut de Biocenotique Experimentale des Agrosystemes URA CNRS 1298, Avenue Monge, Parc de Grandmont, 37200, Tours, France"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:1994
Volume:20
Issue:11
Page Number:2917 - 2930
DOI: 10.1007/BF02098398
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"A comparison of the walking locomotory reactions of flightless and flight formCallosobruchus maculatus males when subjected to an air current scented with female sex pheromone was undertaken in a tubular olfactometer. The pheromone was delivered to the males either as short pulses or as a continuous flow. To analyze the males' reactions, three behavioral sequences were defined (sequence 1: male sensitivity/arousal; sequence 2: male reactivity; sequence 3; male progression and source location). Although flightless and flight form males were sensitive and reactive in all experiments, their locomotory displacement differed depending on the stimulus conditions. The flightless form males' response remained roughly the same whatever the stimulus conditions (i.e., they always reached the pheromone source). In contrast, the flight form males displayed a markedly reduced response when subjected to a continuous stimulation, indicating that intermittent on-off pheromone stimulation is required in order to sustain their upwind walking progress. This effect could be the result of sensory adaptation and/or habituation in the central nervous system of the flight form, requiring a flickering signal that is unnecessary for the flightless one"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINELextrait, P Biemont, J C Pouzat, J eng 1994/11/01 J Chem Ecol. 1994 Nov; 20(11):2917-30. doi: 10.1007/BF02098398"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 01-07-2024