Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractHistidine2 of the alpha-factor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is not essential for binding to its receptor or for biological activity    Next AbstractFecal hydrogen sulfide production in ulcerative colitis »

Dermatol Surg


Title:Gaseous and Particulate Content of Laser Tattoo Removal Plume
Author(s):Levin YS; Grant MP; Glassford E; Green BJ; Lemons AR; Avram MM;
Address:"Department of Dermatology, Wellman Center for Photomedicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts. Hazard Evaluations and Technical Assistance Branch, Division of Field Studies and Engineering, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, Ohio. Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia. Allergy and Clinical Immunology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Morgantown, West Virginia"
Journal Title:Dermatol Surg
Year:2021
Volume:47
Issue:8
Page Number:1071 - 1078
DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003089
ISSN/ISBN:1524-4725 (Electronic) 1076-0512 (Print) 1076-0512 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: There is increasing awareness of the potential hazards of surgical plumes. The plume associated with laser tattoo removal remains uncharacterized. OBJECTIVE: To determine the gaseous, particulate, and microbiological content of the laser tattoo removal plume. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Air sampling was performed during laser tattoo removal from pig skin and from patients. Measurement of metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen sulfide (HS), and ultrafine particulates (UPs) as well as bacterial 16S ribosomal DNA sequencing were performed. RESULTS: Metals were identified in the plume from both pig and human skin. Volatile organic compounds were found at similar levels within and outside the treatment room. Several bacterial phyla were detected in the treatment room, but not outside. High levels of UPs were measured throughout the treatment room during tattoo removal from pig skin. Ultrafine particulates were detected at low levels in the room periphery during tattoo removal from human skin, but at higher levels in the immediate treatment zone. HS and CO were not detected. CONCLUSION: Metals, VOCs, HS, and CO were found at levels below applicable occupational exposure limits. The presence of bacteria is of uncertain significance, but may be hazardous. High levels of UPs require further investigation"
Keywords:"Air/analysis Animals Gases/adverse effects/*analysis Humans Ink *Lasers, Solid-State Models, Animal Occupational Exposure/*adverse effects/standards Particle Size Particulate Matter/adverse effects/*analysis Skin/radiation effects Swine Tattooing/*adverse;"
Notes:"MedlineLevin, Yakir S Grant, Michael P Glassford, Eric Green, Brett J Lemons, Angela R Avram, Mathew M eng CC999999/ImCDC/Intramural CDC HHS/ 2021/08/17 Dermatol Surg. 2021 Aug 1; 47(8):1071-1078. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003089"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024