Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractChemosensory characterization of Chardonnay and Pinot Noir base wines of Champagne. Two very different varieties for a common product    Next AbstractControlled release of volatiles under mild reaction conditions: from nature to everyday products »

J Chromatogr A


Title:Electronic cigarette solutions and resultant aerosol profiles
Author(s):Herrington JS; Myers C;
Address:"Restek Corporation, 110 Benner Circle, Bellefonte, PA 16823, United States. Electronic address: jason.herrington@restek.com. Juniata College, 1700 Moore Street, Huntingdon, PA 16652, United States"
Journal Title:J Chromatogr A
Year:2015
Volume:20150915
Issue:
Page Number:192 - 199
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.09.034
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3778 (Electronic) 0021-9673 (Linking)
Abstract:"Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are growing in popularity exponentially. Despite their ever-growing acceptance, their aerosol has not been fully characterized. The current study focused on evaluating e-cigarette solutions and their resultant aerosol for potential differences. A simple sampling device was developed to draw e-cigarette aerosol into a multi-sorbent thermal desorption (TD) tube, which was then thermally extracted and analyzed via a gas chromatography (GC) mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method. This novel application provided detectable levels of over one hundred fifteen volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs) from a single 40mL puff. The aerosol profiles from four commercially available e-cigarettes were compared to their respective solution profiles with the same GC-MS method. Solution profiles produced upwards of sixty four unidentified and identified (some only tentatively) constituents and aerosol profiles produced upwards of eighty two compounds. Results demonstrated distinct analyte profiles between liquid and aerosol samples. Most notably, formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, and siloxanes were found in the aerosol profiles; however, these compounds were never present in the solutions. These results implicate the aerosolization process in the formation of compounds not found in solutions; have potential implications for human health; and stress the need for an emphasis on electronic cigarette aerosol testing"
Keywords:Acetaldehyde/analysis Acrolein/analysis Aerosols *Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/adverse effects Formaldehyde/analysis Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods Humans Siloxanes/analysis Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis Aerosol E-cigarette El;
Notes:"MedlineHerrington, Jason S Myers, Colton eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Netherlands 2015/10/01 J Chromatogr A. 2015 Oct 30; 1418:192-199. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2015.09.034. Epub 2015 Sep 15"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024