Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMenstrual synchrony in female undergraduates living on a coeducational campus    Next AbstractDeuterium Isotope Fractionation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Meteorites as an Indicator of Interstellar/Protosolar Processing History »

J Econ Entomol


Title:A comparison of trap type and height for capturing cerambycid beetles (Coleoptera)
Author(s):Graham EE; Poland TM; McCullough DG; Millar JG;
Address:"Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 1407 S. Harrison Road, Rm. 220, East Lansing, MI 48823, USA. graha139@msu.edu"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2012
Volume:105
Issue:3
Page Number:837 - 846
DOI: 10.1603/ec12053
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Wood-boring beetles in the family Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) play important roles in many forest ecosystems. However, increasing numbers of invasive cerambycid species are transported to new countries by global commerce and threaten forest health in the United States and worldwide. Our goal was to identify effective detection tools for a broad array of cerambycid species by testing some known cerambycid attractants and a pheromone in different trap designs placed across a range of habitats. We compared numbers and species richness of cerambycid beetles captured with cross-vane panel traps and 12-unit Lindgren multiple-funnel traps, placed either at ground level (1.5 m high) or canopy level (approximately 3-10 m high), at eight sites classified as either residential, industrial, deciduous forest, or conifer forest. We captured 3,723 beetles representing 72 cerambycid species from 10 June to 15 July 2010. Species richness was highest for the subfamilies Cerambycinae and Lamiinae, which accounted for 33 and 46% of all species captured, respectively. Overall, the cross-vane panel traps captured approximately 1.5 times more beetles than funnel traps. Twenty-one species were captured exclusively in traps at one height, either in the canopy or at ground level. More species were captured in hardwood sites (59 species) where a greater diversity of host material was available than in conifer (34 species), residential (41 species), or industrial (49) sites. Low numbers of beetles (n < 5) were recorded for 28 of the beetle species. The number of species captured per week ranged from 49 species on 21 June to 37 species on 12 July. Cross-vane panel traps installed across a vertical gradient should maximize the number of cerambycid species captured"
Keywords:Animals *Coleoptera Ecosystem Insect Control/*instrumentation Pheromones;
Notes:"MedlineGraham, Elizabeth E Poland, Therese M McCullough, Deborah G Millar, Jocelyn G eng Comparative Study Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2012/07/21 J Econ Entomol. 2012 Jun; 105(3):837-46. doi: 10.1603/ec12053"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 28-09-2024