Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDeciphering systemic wound responses of the pumpkin extrafascicular phloem by metabolomics and stable isotope-coded protein labeling    Next AbstractCompetence-pheromone in Streptococcus sanguis. Identification of the competence gene comC and the competence pheromone »

Sci Rep


Title:Compensatory phenolic induction dynamics in aspen after aphid infestation
Author(s):Gaur RK; de Abreu IN; Albrectsen BR;
Address:"Department of Plant Physiology, Umea Plant Science Centre, 90187, Umea, Sweden. Department of Biotechnology, Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Gorakhpur University, Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, 273009, India. Department of Plant Physiology, Umea Plant Science Centre, 90187, Umea, Sweden. benedicte.albrectsen@umu.se"
Journal Title:Sci Rep
Year:2022
Volume:20220610
Issue:1
Page Number:9582 -
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13225-x
ISSN/ISBN:2045-2322 (Electronic) 2045-2322 (Linking)
Abstract:"Condensed tannins (CTs) are polyphenolics and part of the total phenolic (TP) pool that shape resistance in aspen (Populus tremula). CTs are negatively associated with pathogens, but their resistance properties against herbivores are less understood. CTs shape resistance to pathogens and chewing herbivores and could also shape resistance to aphids. Being chemical pools that are highly variable it can further be questioned whether CT-shaped resistance is better described by constitutive levels, by the induced response potential, or by both. Here, aspen genotypes were propagated and selected to represent a range of inherent abilities to produce and store foliar CTs; the plantlets were then exposed to Chaitophorus aphid infestation and to mechanical (leaf rupture) damage, and the relative abundance of constitutive and induced CTs was related to aphid fitness parameters. As expected, aphid fecundity was negatively related to CT-concentrations of the aphid infested plants although more consistently related to TPs. While TPs increased in response to damage, CT induction was generally low and it even dropped below constitutive levels in more CT-rich genotypes, suggesting that constitutive CTs are more relevant measurements of resistance compared to induced CT-levels. Relating CT and TP dynamics with phenolic low molecular compounds further suggested that catechin (the building block of CTs) increased in response to aphid damage in amounts that correlated negatively with CT-induction and positively with constitutive CT-levels and aphid fecundity. Our study portrays dynamic phenolic responses to two kinds of damage detailed for major phenylpropanoid classes and suggests that the ability of a genotype to produce and store CTs may be a measurement of resistance, caused by other, more reactive, phenolic compounds such as catechin. Rupture damage however appeared to induce catechin levels oppositely supporting that CTs may respond differently to different kinds of damage"
Keywords:Animals *Aphids/physiology *Catechin/analysis Herbivory Phenols/analysis Plant Leaves/genetics *Populus/genetics;
Notes:"MedlineGaur, Rajarshi Kumar de Abreu, Ilka Nacif Albrectsen, Benedicte Riber eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2022/06/11 Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 10; 12(1):9582. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13225-x"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-06-2024