Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDifferential gene expression underlying the biosynthesis of Dufour's gland signals in Bombus impatiens    Next AbstractDufour's gland analysis reveals caste and physiology specific signals in Bombus impatiens »

J Insect Sci


Title:"Field trapping the little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata"
Author(s):Derstine NT; Troyer EJ; Suttles CN; Siderhurst LA; Jang EB; Siderhurst MS;
Address:"Department of Chemistry, Eastern Mennonite University, 1200 Park Rd., Harrisonburg, VA 22802, USA. nater06@gmail.com"
Journal Title:J Insect Sci
Year:2012
Volume:12
Issue:
Page Number:93 -
DOI: 10.1673/031.012.9301
ISSN/ISBN:1536-2442 (Electronic) 1536-2442 (Linking)
Abstract:"Two detection methods for the little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata (Roger) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), both employing the pheromone attractant 2,5-dimethyl-3-(2-methylbutyl)pyrazine (2-MeBu-diMePy), were compared with peanut butter based detection, in order to evaluate differences in species specificity and detection reliability. Trapping was conducted using a transect through a macadamia orchard on the island of Hawaii. The transect consisted of a series of three-tree plots, each plot contained a peanut butter coated stick (the most common detection method used for W. auropunctata in Hawaii), a one-way trap treated with 2-MeBu-diMePy, and a piece of double-sided tape treated with 2-MeBu-diMePy. While there were no differences in the number of W. auropunctata counted with each detection method, and no differences in detection reliability (detecting the known presence of W. auropunctata in a plot), the pheromone-incorporating methods showed greater species specificity, retaining W. auropunctata almost exclusively. These results demonstrate the potential of pheromone-detection methods to selectively capture target ant species even when other ants are present and abundant. Combined data from all three detection methods and a previous visual survey along the transect showed a marked difference in the frequency of cohabitation among ant species. Of the 10 ant species collected, W. auropunctata was found as the sole ant species on a given tree at a significantly higher frequency than all other ant species except Pheidole fervens. 94% percent of the trees with W. auropunctata had only W. auropunctata, supporting previous observations that this species tends to displace other ant species. In addition, W. auropunctata microhabitat preferences were investigated using one-way traps containing 2-MeBu-diMePy, which were placed in three arboreal and three non-arboreal locations. While the number of ants captured did not differ by trap placement, when grouped, captures were significantly higher in arboreal than non-arboreal microhabitats"
Keywords:Animals Ants/*drug effects/physiology Arachis/*chemistry Biota Ecosystem Hawaii Insect Control/*methods Macadamia Pheromones/*pharmacology Pyrazines/*pharmacology Species Specificity;
Notes:"MedlineDerstine, Nathan T Troyer, Elisa J Suttles, Caitlyn N Siderhurst, Leigh A Jang, Eric B Siderhurst, Matthew S eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/02/21 J Insect Sci. 2012; 12:93. doi: 10.1673/031.012.9301"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 29-06-2024