Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractUraba lugens (Lepidoptera: Nolidae) in New Zealand: pheromone trapping for delimitation and phenology    Next AbstractPheromone disruption of Argentine ant trail integrity »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Trapping Dasinuera mali (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) in apples
Author(s):Suckling DM; Walker JT; Shaw PW; Manning LA; Lo P; Wallis R; Bell V; Sandanayaka WR; Hall DR; Cross JV; El-Sayed AM;
Address:"HortResearch, P.O. Box 51, Lincoln, New Zealand. msuckling@hortresearch.co.nz"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2007
Volume:100
Issue:3
Page Number:745 - 751
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[745:tdmdci]2.0.co;2
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"The midge Dasineura mali (Kieffer) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) is a significant pest of apples (Malus spp.), and the recent identification of the female sex pheromone is enabling new direct control tactics to be considered. Direct control using male suppression will require knowledge of the frequency of multiple mating, dispersal and colonization rates, and the efficiency of male removal. Males were able to mate up to five times, with a mean of 2.7 times when presented in a 10 female-to-1 male group, designed to simulate male suppression. Male catch in response to the pheromone loading was curvilinear over 4 orders of magnitude from 3 microg to 30 mg on rubber septa. Trapping using a high-dose pheromone lure was combined with oil-based traps similar to the inexpensive New Zealand 'Lynfield trap' used for tephritid surveillance, to test male suppression in young orchard blocks at 500 traps per ha. Monitoring traps indicated 96% lower catch in the treated plots compared with control plots, over 137 d. However, a lack of shoot tip infestation in both treated and untreated plots indicated limited colonization and prevented an assessment of potential population suppression. Furthermore, a contribution to these results from communication disruption cannot be ruled out. Replicated transects of frequency of infested shoots from a mature orchard across the adjacent young block confirmed that colonization by ovipositing females was essentially limited to the first 30 m"
Keywords:"Animals Diptera/*drug effects/physiology Female Male Malus/*parasitology Pest Control, Biological/*methods Pheromones/*pharmacology Sexual Behavior, Animal;"
Notes:"MedlineSuckling, David Maxwell Walker, James T S Shaw, Peter W Manning, Lee-Anne Lo, Peter Wallis, Roger Bell, Vaughn Sandanayaka, W R Manoharie Hall, David R Cross, Jerry V El-Sayed, Ashraf M eng Comparative Study Evaluation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2007/06/30 J Econ Entomol. 2007 Jun; 100(3):745-51. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[745:tdmdci]2.0.co; 2"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024