Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPassive dosing for producing defined and constant exposure of hydrophobic organic compounds during in vitro toxicity tests    Next AbstractThematic review series: skin lipids. Sebaceous gland lipids: friend or foe? »

Chemosphere


Title:Passive dosing versus solvent spiking for controlling and maintaining hydrophobic organic compound exposure in the Microtox(R) assay
Author(s):Smith KE; Jeong Y; Kim J;
Address:"Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Campus E 7.1, Universitat des Saarlandes, Saarbrucken, Germany. Electronic address: kecsmith@gmail.com. Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Campus E 7.1, Universitat des Saarlandes, Saarbrucken, Germany"
Journal Title:Chemosphere
Year:2015
Volume:20150625
Issue:
Page Number:174 - 180
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.028
ISSN/ISBN:1879-1298 (Electronic) 0045-6535 (Linking)
Abstract:"Microbial toxicity bioassays such as the Microtox(R) test are ubiquitously applied to measure the toxicity of chemicals and environmental samples. In many ways their operation is conducive to the testing of organic chemicals. They are of short duration, use glass cuvettes and take place at reduced temperatures in medium lacking sorbing components. All of these are expected to reduce sorptive and volatile losses, but particularly for hydrophobic organics the role of such losses in determining the bioassay response remains unclear. This study determined the response of the Microtox(R) test when using solvent spiking compared to passive dosing for introducing the model hydrophobic compounds acenaphthene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene and benzo(a)pyrene. Compared to solvent spiking, the apparent sensitivity of the Microtox(R) test with passive dosing was 3.4 and 12.4 times higher for acenaphthene and phenanthrene, respectively. Furthermore, fluoranthene only gave a consistent response with passive dosing. Benzo(a)pyrene did not result in a response with either spiking or passive dosing even at aqueous solubility. Such differences in the apparent sensitivity of the Microtox(R) test can be traced back to the precise definition of the dissolved exposure concentrations and the buffering of losses with passive dosing. This highlights the importance of exposure control even in simple and short-term microbial bioassays such as the Microtox(R) test"
Keywords:Biological Assay/*methods Environmental Pollutants/*toxicity Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons/*toxicity Solvents Toxicity Tests/*methods Hydrophobic organic compounds Microtox(R) test Passive dosing Solvent spiking;
Notes:"MedlineSmith, Kilian E C Jeong, Yoonah Kim, Jongwoon eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2015/06/29 Chemosphere. 2015 Nov; 139:174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.028. Epub 2015 Jun 25"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 16-11-2024