« Previous AbstractThe impact of pasture and non-pasture diets on the sensory and volatile properties of whole milk powder    Next AbstractThe brain of the African wild dog. II. The olfactory system »

J Breath Res

Title:		An electronic nose in the discrimination of breath from smokers and non-smokers: a model for toxin exposure
Author(s):		Cheng ZJ; Warwick G; Yates DH; Thomas PS;
Address:		"Centre for Infection and Inflammation Research and Prince of Wales Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia"
Journal Title:		J Breath Res
Year:		2009
Volume:		20090807
Issue:		3
Page Number:		36003 -
DOI:		10.1088/1752-7155/3/3/036003
ISSN/ISBN:		1752-7163 (Electronic) 1752-7155 (Linking)
Abstract:		"Exhaled breath contains hundreds of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that may be used as non-invasive markers of lung disease. Electronic noses (e-noses) can analyse VOCs by composite nanosensor arrays with learning algorithms. This study investigated the use of an e-nose (Cyranose C320) to distinguish the breath of smokers from that of non-smokers. Smoking and non-smoking subjects exhaled from total lung capacity into a 2 L Tedlar bag and these samples were introduced offline to the e-nose in a random order. Two classes of breath, 'smoker' and 'non-smoker', were established and this model was then cross-validated. Principal component analysis then identified the maximal point of difference between classes. Smellprints of breath from smokers were separated from those of non-smokers (cross-validation value, 95%; Mahalanobis distance, 3.96). Subsequently, 15 smokers (mean age 37.9 +/- 4.78 years, FEV(1) 3.15 +/- 0.21 L), and 24 non-smokers (add mean age and FEV1 as for smokers) were sampled to revalidate the model. The e-nose correctly identified the smoking status in 37 of the 39 subjects. This demonstrates that the e-nose is simple to use in clinical practice and can differentiate the breath of smokers from that of non-smokers. It may prove to be a useful, non-invasive tool for further breath assessment of exposure to other inhaled noxious substances as well as disease monitoring"
Keywords:
Notes:		"PubMed-not-MEDLINECheng, Z J Warwick, G Yates, D H Thomas, P S eng England 2009/09/01 J Breath Res. 2009 Sep; 3(3):036003. doi: 10.1088/1752-7155/3/3/036003. Epub 2009 Aug 7"