Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractTight genetic linkage of prezygotic barrier loci creates a multifunctional speciation island in Petunia    Next Abstract"Structural, signalling and regulatory properties of the group I metabotropic glutamate receptors: prototypic family C G-protein-coupled receptors" »

Oecologia


Title:Prey perception of predation risk: volatile chemical cues mediate non-consumptive effects of a predator on a herbivorous insect
Author(s):Hermann SL; Thaler JS;
Address:"Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA, slh275@cornell.edu"
Journal Title:Oecologia
Year:2014
Volume:20140919
Issue:3
Page Number:669 - 676
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-014-3069-5
ISSN/ISBN:1432-1939 (Electronic) 0029-8549 (Linking)
Abstract:"Predators can affect prey in two ways-by reducing their density (consumptive effects) or by changing their behavior, physiology or other phenotypic traits (non-consumptive effects). Understanding the cues and sensory modalities prey use to detect predators is critical for predicting the strength of non-consumptive effects and the outcome of predator-prey encounters. While predator-associated cues have been well studied in aquatic systems, less is known about how terrestrial prey, particularly insect larvae, detect their predators. We evaluated how Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, larvae perceive predation risk by isolating cues from its stink bug predator, the spined soldier bug, Podisus maculiventris. When exposed to male 'risk' predators that were surgically manipulated so they could hunt but not kill, beetles reduced feeding 29% compared to controls. Exposure to risk females caused an intermediate response. Beetles ate 24% less on leaves pre-exposed to predators compared to leaves never exposed to predators, indicating that tactile and visual cues are not required for the prey's response. Volatile odor cues from predators reduced beetle feeding by 10% overall, although male predators caused a stronger reduction than females. Finally, visual cues from the predator had a weak effect on beetle feeding. Because multiple cues appear to be involved in prey perception of risk, and because male and female predators have differential effects, beetle larvae likely experience tremendous variation in the information about risk from their local environment"
Keywords:Animals Coleoptera/growth & development/*physiology Cues Female *Food Chain *Herbivory Heteroptera/*physiology Larva/physiology Male Olfactory Perception *Predatory Behavior Risk Sex Characteristics Visual Perception Volatile Organic Compounds/metabolism;
Notes:"MedlineHermann, Sara L Thaler, Jennifer S eng Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Germany 2014/09/23 Oecologia. 2014 Nov; 176(3):669-76. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3069-5. Epub 2014 Sep 19"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-11-2024