Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Apparent long-term bodily contamination by disparlure, the gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar) Attractant"    Next AbstractA novel screen for genes associated with pheromone-induced sterility »

Naturwissenschaften


Title:How flies respond to honey bee pheromone: the role of the foraging gene on reproductive response to queen mandibular pheromone
Author(s):Camiletti AL; Awde DN; Thompson GJ;
Address:"Biology Department, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON, N6A 5B7, Canada, acamilet@uwo.ca"
Journal Title:Naturwissenschaften
Year:2014
Volume:20131210
Issue:1
Page Number:25 - 31
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-013-1125-3
ISSN/ISBN:1432-1904 (Electronic) 0028-1042 (Linking)
Abstract:"In this study we test one central prediction from sociogenomic theory--that social and non-social taxa share common genetic toolkits that regulate reproduction in response to environmental cues. We exposed Drosophila females of rover (for(R)) and sitter (for(s)) genotypes to an ovary-suppressing pheromone derived from the honeybee Apis mellifera. Surprisingly, queen mandibular pheromone (QMP) affected several measures of fitness in flies, and in a manner comparable to the pheromone's normal effect on bee workers. QMP-treated sitter flies had smaller ovaries that contained fewer eggs than did untreated controls. QMP-treated rover flies, by contrast, showed a more variable pattern that only sometimes resulted in ovary inhibition, while a third strain of fly that contains a sitter mutant allele in a rover background (for(s2)) showed no ovarian response to QMP. Taken together, our results suggest that distinctly non-social insects have some capacity to respond to social cues, but that this response varies with fly genotype. In general, the interspecific response is consistent with a conserved gene set affecting reproductive physiology. The differential response among strains in particular suggests that for is itself important for modulating the fly's pheromonal response"
Keywords:Animals Bees/*chemistry Drosophila/*drug effects/genetics Female Genotype Mutation Ovary/drug effects Pheromones/*pharmacology Reproduction/drug effects;
Notes:"MedlineCamiletti, Alison L Awde, David N Thompson, Graham J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Germany 2013/12/11 Naturwissenschaften. 2014 Jan; 101(1):25-31. doi: 10.1007/s00114-013-1125-3. Epub 2013 Dec 10"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024