Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractIdentification and functional analysis of olfactory receptor family reveal unusual characteristics of the olfactory system in the migratory locust    Next AbstractDetection of Melanoma Cancer Biomarker Dimethyl Disulfide Using Cavity Ringdown Spectroscopy at 266 nm »

Sci Rep


Title:Bees eavesdrop upon informative and persistent signal compounds in alarm pheromones
Author(s):Wang Z; Wen P; Qu Y; Dong S; Li J; Tan K; Nieh JC;
Address:"Key Laboratory of Tropical Forest Ecology, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming, Yunnan Province, 650223 China. Eastern Bee Research Institute, Yunnan Agricultural University, 650201 Kunming, China. Division of Biological Sciences Section of Ecology, Behavior, and Evolution University of California, San Diego La Jolla, California, USA"
Journal Title:Sci Rep
Year:2016
Volume:20160509
Issue:
Page Number:25693 -
DOI: 10.1038/srep25693
ISSN/ISBN:2045-2322 (Electronic) 2045-2322 (Linking)
Abstract:"Pollinators such as bees provide a critical ecosystem service that can be impaired by information about predation. We provide the first evidence for olfactory eavesdropping and avoidance of heterospecific alarm signals, alarm pheromones, at food sources in bees. We predicted that foragers could eavesdrop upon heterospecific alarm pheromones, and would detect and avoid conspicuous individual pheromone compounds, defined by abundance and their ability to persist. We show that Apis cerana foragers avoid the distinctive alarm pheromones of A. dorsata and A. mellifera, species that share the same floral resources and predators. We next examined responses to individual alarm pheromone compounds. Apis cerana foragers avoided isopentyl acetate (IPA), which is found in all three species and is the most abundant and volatile of the tested compounds. Interestingly, A. cerana also avoided an odor component, gamma-octanoic lactone (GOL), which is >150-fold less volatile than IPA. Chemical analyses confirmed that GOL is only present in A. dorsata, not in A. cerana. Electroantennogram (EAG) recordings revealed that A. cerana antennae are 10-fold more sensitive to GOL than to other tested compounds. Thus, the eavesdropping strategy is shaped by signal conspicuousness (abundance and commonality) and signal persistence (volatility)"
Keywords:"Animals Arthropod Antennae/physiology Bees/drug effects/*physiology Behavior, Animal/*drug effects Feeding Behavior/drug effects Pheromones/*pharmacology;"
Notes:"MedlineWang, Zhengwei Wen, Ping Qu, Yufeng Dong, Shihao Li, Jianjun Tan, Ken Nieh, James C eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2016/05/10 Sci Rep. 2016 May 9; 6:25693. doi: 10.1038/srep25693"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-06-2024