Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMeasurements of OH reactivity and photochemical ozone production in the urban atmosphere    Next AbstractThe effects of maternal diabetes and insulin treatment on neurogenesis in the developing hippocampus of male rats »

J Evol Biol


Title:"Modulation of sexual signalling by immune challenged male mealworm beetles (Tenebrio molitor, L.): evidence for terminal investment and dishonesty"
Author(s):Sadd B; Holman L; Armitage H; Lock F; Marland R; Siva-Jothy MT;
Address:"Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK"
Journal Title:J Evol Biol
Year:2006
Volume:19
Issue:2
Page Number:321 - 325
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01062.x
ISSN/ISBN:1010-061X (Print) 1010-061X (Linking)
Abstract:"Organisms partition resources into life-history traits in order to maximise fitness over their expected lifespan. For the males of many species fitness is determined by qualitative and quantitative aspects of costly sexual signals: The notion that epigamic traits are costly forms the cornerstone of those theories that propose parasites drive sexual selection. Consequently studies examining this notion assume sexual signalling is honest (i.e. driven by cost) when they seek to identify correlations or causal links between male immune function and attractiveness. We demonstrate that immune challenged males of the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor, increased their investment in epigamic pheromone signals: these males became significantly more attractive to females whilst increasing the activity of a key immune effector system. In other words males increase terminal reproductive effort (invest in attractiveness) in response to a survival threat (immune insult). Consequently the signal preferred by the female is dishonest when considering the male's condition"
Keywords:"Animal Communication Animals Female Hemolymph/enzymology Male Monophenol Monooxygenase/metabolism Pheromones/*physiology *Sexual Behavior, Animal Tenebrio/*immunology/*physiology;"
Notes:"MedlineSadd, B Holman, L Armitage, H Lock, F Marland, R Siva-Jothy, M T eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Switzerland 2006/04/08 J Evol Biol. 2006 Mar; 19(2):321-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.01062.x"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024