Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMultiple Mating in the Citrophilous Mealybug Pseudococcus calceolariae: Implications for Mating Disruption    Next AbstractFrom plant resistance response to the discovery of antimicrobial compounds: The role of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in grapevine downy mildew infection »

Insects


Title:"Mating Disruption for Managing the Honeydew Moth, Cryptoblabes gnidiella (Milliere), in Mediterranean Vineyards"
Author(s):Ricciardi R; Di Giovanni F; Cosci F; Ladurner E; Savino F; Iodice A; Benelli G; Lucchi A;
Address:"Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, via del Borghetto 80, 56124 Pisa, Italy. CBC (Europe) srl, Biogard Division, via Zanica, 25, 24050 Grassobbio, Italy"
Journal Title:Insects
Year:2021
Volume:20210428
Issue:5
Page Number: -
DOI: 10.3390/insects12050390
ISSN/ISBN:2075-4450 (Print) 2075-4450 (Electronic) 2075-4450 (Linking)
Abstract:"The demand for a reduced use of pesticides in agriculture requires the development of specific strategies for managing arthropod pests. Among eco-friendly pest control tools, pheromone-based mating disruption (MD) is promising for controlling several key insect pests of economic importance, including many lepidopteran species. In our study, we evaluated an MD approach for managing the honeydew moth (HM), Cryptoblabes gnidiella, an emerging threat for the grapevine in the Mediterranean basin. The trials were carried out in two study sites, located in Tuscany (central Italy, years 2017-2019) and Apulia (southern Italy, years 2016 and 2018-2019), and by applying MD dispensers only in April, in April and July, and only in July. To evaluate the effects of MD, infested bunches (%), damaged area (%) per bunch, and number of living larvae per bunch were compared among plots covered with MD dispensers, insecticide-treated plots (Apulia only), and untreated control plots. Male flights were monitored using pheromone-baited sticky traps. Except for the sampling carried out in Tuscany in 2018, where HM infestation level was very low, a significant difference was recorded between MD and control plots, both in terms of HM damage caused to ripening grapes and/or number of living larvae per bunch. Overall, our study highlighted that MD, irrespective of the application timing, significantly reduced HM damage; the levels of control achieved here were similar to those obtained with the application of insecticides (no MD). However, MD used as stand-alone strategy was not able to provide complete pest control, which may instead be pursued by growers with an IPM approach"
Keywords:Integrated Pest Management chemical ecology grapevine sex pheromone;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINERicciardi, Renato Di Giovanni, Filippo Cosci, Francesca Ladurner, Edith Savino, Francesco Iodice, Andrea Benelli, Giovanni Lucchi, Andrea eng Switzerland 2021/05/01 Insects. 2021 Apr 28; 12(5):390. doi: 10.3390/insects12050390"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-07-2024