Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Novel repellents for the blood-sucking insects Rhodnius prolixus and Triatoma infestans, vectors of Chagas disease"    Next AbstractDevelopment of a thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method for determining personal care products in air »

Talanta


Title:Comparative study of solvent extraction and thermal desorption methods for determining a wide range of volatile organic compounds in ambient air
Author(s):Ramirez N; Cuadras A; Rovira E; Borrull F; Marce RM;
Address:"Department of Analytical Chemistry and Organic Chemistry, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain"
Journal Title:Talanta
Year:2010
Volume:20100524
Issue:2
Page Number:719 - 727
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.05.038
ISSN/ISBN:1873-3573 (Electronic) 0039-9140 (Linking)
Abstract:"This paper compares two analytical methods for determining levels of 90 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) commonly found in industrial and urban atmospheres. Both methods are based on two official methods for determining benzene levels and involve collecting samples by active adsorptive enrichment on solid sorbents. The first method involves solvent extraction and uses activated charcoal as a sorbent. After sampling, the sorbent is extracted with 1 mL of carbon disulfide and then 1 microL of the extract is analysed in a GC-MS. The second method involves thermal desorption (TD) and uses Tenax TA and Carbograph 1TD as sorbents, which allows the whole sample to be analysed. In general, the thermal desorption method showed the best repetitivity and recovery and the lowest limit of detection and quantification for all target compounds. Because of its lower sensitivity, the solvent extraction method needs the preconcentration of large sample volumes of air (720 L vs. 2.64 L for the thermal desorption method) to yield similar limits of detection. The performance of both methods in real samples was tested in a location near to a petrochemical complex. The results of the 24-h samples for the solvent extraction method were compared with the average of 12 2-h samples for the TD method. In some cases, both methods found differences in the VOC concentrations, especially in those compounds whose concentrations fluctuate significantly during the day"
Keywords:"Air/*analysis Chemistry Techniques, Analytical/classification/methods Environmental Monitoring/methods Solvents/*chemistry Temperature Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineRamirez, Noelia Cuadras, Anna Rovira, Enric Borrull, Francesc Marce, Rosa Maria eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Netherlands 2010/07/07 Talanta. 2010 Jul 15; 82(2):719-27. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.05.038. Epub 2010 May 24"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 20-09-2024