Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractManipulation of food resources by a gall-forming aphid: the physiology of sink-source interactions    Next AbstractThe impact of two gall-forming arthropods on the photosynthetic rates of their hosts »

Oecologia


Title:Competition between gall aphids and natural plant sinks: plant architecture affects resistance to galling
Author(s):Larson KC; Whitham TG;
Address:"Department of Biology University of Central Arkansas Conway, AR 72035, USA, , , , , , US. Department of Biological Sciences Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AR 86011, USA, , , , , , US"
Journal Title:Oecologia
Year:1997
Volume:109
Issue:4
Page Number:575 - 582
DOI: 10.1007/s004420050119
ISSN/ISBN:1432-1939 (Electronic) 0029-8549 (Linking)
Abstract:"Gall forming herbivores induce sinks and act as phloem parasites within their host plants. Their performance on the host plant can depend on the sink-source relationship they establish with the plant. Because sink-source relationships within a plant are reflected in its architecture, we examined how architectural differences among cottonwoods might influence the success of the galling aphid, Pemphigus betae. Using cloned cottonwoods in common garden studies, we found three major patterns. First, there is a significant clonal or genetic component to tree architecture; cloned trees grown in a common garden maintain the architecture of parental trees. Second, resistant tree genotypes have more natural sinks (i.e., buds) relative to sources (i.e., stem volume) than susceptible trees. Third, these differences in architecture result in greater competition among sinks on aphid-resistant trees than on aphid-susceptible trees. Sink competition within a tree was estimated by the Gini coefficient which quantifies the size inequality of a shoot population (i.e., competition among sinks is low when shoots are nearly equal in size, and great when a few shoots are large and most are small). Aphid death through gall abortion increased significantly (r (2) = 0.65) on garden-grown trees as competition among sinks within a tree increased. Based on these observations we proposed the 'sink competition hypothesis' to account for the performance of gall formers on their host plants. To test this hypothesis, we experimentally reduced sink densities (i.e., buds) on branches of resistant tree genotypes to resemble the bud densities of susceptible genotypes. By reducing the number of competing sinks, we predicted that aphid survival would increase. As predicted, aphid survival significantly increased. For example, in one removal experiment, aphid survival increased from 20% on control branches to 55% on branches with the highest level of bud removal. Similar bud removals on susceptible trees did not increase aphid survival, indicating that competition is relaxed on susceptible hosts. With the exception of the plant vigor hypothesis, most current hypotheses explaining herbivore distributions in nature focus on the importance to leaf-chewing herbivores of variation in chemistry. We believe that a sink competition model is needed to explain the distributions of the diverse group of herbivores that act as phloem parasites. The sink competition model is more mechanistic than the vigor hypothesis, and may account for apparent contradictions because it more clearly quantifies the resource base and the potential interactions that occur when sinks, either herbivore-induced or natural, compete for sources"
Keywords:Competition Galls Key words Sink-source Modular architecture Resistance;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINELarson, K C Whitham, Thomas G eng Germany 1997/02/01 Oecologia. 1997 Feb; 109(4):575-582. doi: 10.1007/s004420050119"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-12-2024