Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractLoss of sustained Fus3p kinase activity and the G1 arrest response in cells expressing an inappropriate pheromone receptor    Next Abstract"Assessment of a regulatory model's performance relative to large spatial heterogeneity in observed ozone in Houston, Texas" »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Alarm pheromones do not mediate rapid shifts in honey bee guard acceptance threshold
Author(s):Couvillon MJ; Barton SN; Cohen JA; Fabricius OK; Karcher MH; Cooper LS; Silk MJ; Helantera H; Ratnieks FL;
Address:"Laboratory of Apiculture & Social Insects, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton, UK. M.Couvillon@Sussex.ac.uk"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2010
Volume:20101111
Issue:12
Page Number:1306 - 1308
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-010-9881-4
ISSN/ISBN:1573-1561 (Electronic) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Honey bee (Apis mellifera) guards discriminate nestmates from non-nestmates at the hive entrance. The acceptance threshold of guards is known to change adaptively, for example becoming less permissive when the number of intruder bees from other colonies increases. These adaptive shifts can occur within minutes. What is unknown is the mechanism behind this rapid shift. It was hypothesized that alarm pheromones released by guards may cause the adoption of a less permissive acceptance threshold. Here, we tested this hypothesis on five discriminator hives by using a behavioral assay. We used three amounts each of iso-pentyl acetate (IPA) and 2-heptanone (2H), which are the major components of the pheromones from the sting and the mandibular glands, respectively. Biologically relevant levels of chemicals were delivered to the hive entrance platform via an air pump. We found no effect of either IPA or 2H: there was no change in guard acceptance of either nestmate (on average, 91% accepted) or non-nestmate (on average, 30% accepted) under any of the pheromone treatments compared to the pentane control (98% nestmates accepted and 32% non-nestmates accepted). Therefore, we reject the hypothesis that the presence of IPA or 2H causes a rapid shift of guard acceptance threshold"
Keywords:Animal Communication Animals Bees/*physiology Ketones/metabolism Pentanols/metabolism Pheromones/physiology Social Behavior Social Environment;
Notes:"MedlineCouvillon, Margaret J Barton, Sarah N Cohen, Jennifer A Fabricius, Onna K Karcher, Martin H Cooper, Lee S Silk, Matthew J Helantera, Heikki Ratnieks, Francis L W eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2010/11/12 J Chem Ecol. 2010 Dec; 36(12):1306-8. doi: 10.1007/s10886-010-9881-4. Epub 2010 Nov 11"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-11-2024