« Previous AbstractHierarchical stratification of the factors related to exertional dyspnoea and exercise intolerance in male COPD patients    Next AbstractMultiple functional domains of Enterococcus faecalis aggregation substance Asc10 contribute to endocarditis virulence »

J Environ Manage

Title:		A numerical study of reducing the concentration of O(3) and PM(2.5) simultaneously in Taiwan
Author(s):		Chuang MT; Chou CC; Lin CY; Lee JH; Lin WC; Chen YY; Chang CC; Lee CT; Kong SS; Lin TH;
Address:		"Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. Electronic address: mtchuang100@gmail.com. Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, Taipei, 11529, Taiwan. Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan, 32001, Taiwan. Department of Atmospheric Sciences, National Central University, Taoyuan, 32001, Taiwan. Center for Space and Remote Sensing Research, National Central University, Taoyuan, 32001, Taiwan"
Journal Title:		J Environ Manage
Year:		2022
Volume:		20220629
Issue:
Page Number:		115614 -
DOI:		10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115614
ISSN/ISBN:		1095-8630 (Electronic) 0301-4797 (Linking)
Abstract:		"Since the 24-hr PM(2.5) (particle aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 mum) concentration standard was regulated in Taiwan in 2012, the PM(2.5) concentration has been decreasing year by year, but the ozone (O(3)) concentration remains almost the same. In particular, the daily maximum 8-hr average O(3) (MDA8 O(3)) concentration frequently exceeds the standard. The goal of this study is to find a solution for reducing PM(2.5) and O(3) simultaneously by numerical modeling. After the Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC(S))-limited and nitrogen oxides (NO(X))-limited areas were defined in Taiwan, then, in total, 50 scenarios are simulated in this study. In terms of the average in Taiwan, the effect of VOC(S) emission reduction is better than that of NO(X) on the decrease in PM(2.5) concentration, when the same reduction proportion (20%, 40%) is implemented. While the effect of further NO(X) emission reduction (60%) will exceed that of VOC(S). The decrease in PM(2.5) is proportional to the reduction in precursor emissions such as NO(X), VOC(S), sulfur dioxides (SO(2)), and ammonia (NH(3)). The lower reduction of NO(X) emission for whole Taiwan caused O(3) increases on average but higher reduction can ease the increase, which suggests the implement of NO(X) emission reductions must be cautious. When comparing administrative jurisdictions in terms of grids, districts/towns, and cities/counties, it was found that controlling NO(X) and VOC(S) at a finer spatial resolution of control units did not benefit the decrease in PM(2.5) but did benefit the decrease in O(3). The enhanced O(3) control strategies obviously cause a higher decrease of O(3) throughout Taiwan due to NO(X) and VOC(S) emission changes when they are implemented in the right places. Finally, three sets of short-term and long-term goals of controlling PM(2.5) and O(3) simultaneously are drawn from the comprehensive rankings for all simulated scenarios, depending on whether PM(2.5) or O(3) control is more urgent. In principle, the short-term scenarios could be ordinary or enhanced version of O(3) decrease with lower NO(X)/VOC(S) emissions, while the long-term scenario is enhanced version of O(3) decrease plus high emission reductions for all precursors"
Keywords:		*Air Pollutants/analysis *Air Pollution/analysis/prevention & control China Environmental Monitoring *Ozone/analysis Particulate Matter/analysis Taiwan *Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis Cmaq NO(X)-VOC(S)-Limited O(3) Pm(2.5);
Notes:		"MedlineChuang, Ming-Tung Chou, Charles C-K Lin, Chuan-Yao Lee, Ja-Huai Lin, Wei-Che Chen, Yi-Ying Chang, Chih-Chung Lee, Chung-Te Kong, Steven Soon-Kai Lin, Tang-Huang eng England 2022/07/03 J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 15; 318:115614. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115614. Epub 2022 Jun 29"