Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Volatile compounds, physicochemical and sensory characteristics of Colatura di Alici, a traditional Italian fish sauce"    Next Abstract"Toxicity, repellency, and transfer of chlorfenapyr against western subterranean termites (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae)" »

J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother


Title:Patient-Controlled Analgesia vs Intravenous Push Hydromorphone for Pain Management of Vaso-Occlusive Crisis Associated With Sickle Cell Disease
Author(s):Russo K; Chhunchha P;
Address:"the Department of Pharmacy, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, and the Department of Pharmacy, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. the Department of Pharmacy, Pennsylvania Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA"
Journal Title:J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother
Year:2023
Volume:20230126
Issue:2
Page Number:116 - 122
DOI: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2167035
ISSN/ISBN:1536-0539 (Electronic) 1536-0288 (Linking)
Abstract:"Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) appears to be the preferred modality for treatment of pain associated with vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) and is the current standard of therapy at most institutions. With limited data available, this study analyzed the effectiveness of PCA vs intravenous push (IVP) hydromorphone for pain management of VOC. The primary objective was to determine whether PCA or IVP hydromorphone is more effective in controlling VOC pain determined by a reduction in mean absolute difference pain intensity (MPI) from baseline to discharge. This retrospective single-center study evaluated differences in outcomes between patients treated with PCA vs those treated with IVP hydromorphone for VOC during hospital admission. Those 18 years or older admitted with one of the following International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes were included: D57.0 (Hb-SS disease with crisis), D57.2 (sickle cell/Hb-C disease), and D57.4 (sickle cell thalassemia), and administered PCA or IVP hydromorphone. The observed difference in absolute pain scores were not statistically significant (p = 0.753). The use of IVP hydromorphone resulted in a significant reduction in length of stay (LOS) and morphine milligram equivalent (MME) use compared to PCA, but was associated with a numerical increase in treatment failures. This study was limited by its retrospective nature, uneven distribution of groups, and only reviewed use of IVP and PCA hydromorphone at one institution"
Keywords:"Humans Pain Management/methods Analgesia, Patient-Controlled/methods Hydromorphone/therapeutic use Retrospective Studies *Volatile Organic Compounds *Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications Pain/drug therapy/etiology Hydromorphone intravenous push patient-contr;"
Notes:"MedlineRusso, Katharine Chhunchha, Poonam eng England 2023/01/27 J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2023 Jun; 37(2):116-122. doi: 10.1080/15360288.2023.2167035. Epub 2023 Jan 26"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-11-2024